Attentive deep learning-based tumor-only somatic mutation classifier achieves high accuracy agnostic of tissue type and capture kit.
McLaughlin, R. T.; Asthana, M.; Di Meo, M.; Ceccarelli, M.; Jacob, H. J.; Masica, D. L.
Show abstract
In precision oncology, reliable identification of tumor-specific DNA mutations requires sequencing tumor DNA and non-tumor DNA (so-called "matched normal") from the same patient. The normal sample allows researchers to distinguish acquired (somatic) and hereditary (germline) variants. The ability to distinguish somatic and germline variants facilitates estimation of tumor mutation burden (TMB), which is a recently FDA-approved pan-cancer marker for highly successful cancer immunotherapies; in tumor-only variant calling (i.e., without a matched normal), the difficulty in discriminating germline and somatic variants results in inflated and unreliable TMB estimates. We apply machine learning to the task of somatic vs germline classification in tumor-only samples using TabNet, a recently developed attentive deep learning model for tabular data that has achieved state of the art performance in multiple classification tasks (Arik and Pfister 2019). We constructed a training set for supervised classification using features derived from tumor-only variant calling and drawing somatic and germline truth-labels from an independent pipeline incorporating the patient-matched normal samples. Our trained model achieved state-of-the-art performance on two hold-out test datasets: a TCGA dataset including sarcoma, breast adenocarcinoma, and endometrial carcinoma samples (F1-score: 88.3), and a metastatic melanoma dataset, (F1-score 79.8). Concordance between matched-normal and tumor-only TMB improves from R2 = 0.006 to 0.705 with the addition of our classifier. And importantly, this approach generalizes across tumor tissue types and capture kits and has a call rate of 100%. The interpretable feature masks of the attentive deep learning model explain the reasons for misclassified variants. We reproduce the recent finding that tumor-only TMB estimates for Black patients are extremely inflated relative to that of White patients due to the racial biases of germline databases. We show that our machine learning approach appreciably reduces this racial bias in tumor-only variant-calling.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accelerated somatic mutation calling for whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data from heterogenous tumor samples 95%
- Reconstruction of clone- and haplotype-specific cancer genome karyotypes from bulk tumor samples 94%
- A Complete Pedigree-Based Graph Workflow for Rare Candidate Variant Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- OncoGEMINI: Software for Investigating Tumor Variants From Multiple Biopsies With Integrated Cancer Annotations 94%
- CACTUS: integrating clonal architecture with genomic clustering and transcriptome profiling of single tumor cells 94%
- varCADD: large sets of standing genetic variation enable genome-wide pathogenicity prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- N-of-one differential gene expression without control samples using a deep generative model 96%
- CaClust: linking genotype to transcriptional heterogeneity of follicular lymphoma using BCR and exomic variants 95%
- Enhancing sensitivity and controlling false discovery rate in somatic indel discovery 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.