Back

Leveraging a physiologically based quantitative translational modeling platform for designing bispecific T cell engagers for treatment of multiple myeloma

Yoneyama, T.; Kim, M.-S.; Piatkov, K.; Wang, H.; Zhu, A. Z. X.

2021-12-07 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2021.12.06.471352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bispecific T cell engager (TCE) is an emerging anti-cancer modality which redirects cytotoxic T cells to tumor cells expressing tumor-associated antigen (TAA) thereby forming immune synapses to exerts anti-tumor effects. Considering the protein engineering challenges in designing and optimizing size and pharmacokinetically acceptable TCEs in the context of the complexity of intercellular bridging between T cells and tumor cells, a physiologically relevant and clinically verified computational modeling framework is of crucial importance to guide the process to understand the protein engineering trade offs. In this study, we developed a quantitative, physiologically based computational framework to predict immune synapse formation for a variety of molecular format of TCEs in tumor tissue. Our model incorporated the molecular size dependent biodistribution using the two pore theory, extra-vascularization of T cells and hematologic cancer cells, mechanistic bispecific intercellular binding of TCEs and competitive inhibitory interaction by shed targets. The biodistribution of TCE was verified by positron emission tomography imaging of [89Zr]AMG211 (a carcinoembryonic antigen-targeting TCE) in patients. Parameter sensitivity analyses indicated that immune synapse formation was highly sensitive to TAA expression, degree of target shedding and binding selectivity to tumor cell surface TAA over shed target. Interestingly, the model suggested a "sweet spot" for TCEs CD3 binding affinity which balanced the trapping of TCE in T cell rich organs. The final model simulations indicated that the number of immune synapses is similar ([~]50/tumor cell) between two distinct clinical stage B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting TCEs, PF-06863135 in IgG format and AMG420 in BiTE format, at their respective efficacious dose in multiple myeloma patients, demonstrating the applicability of the developed computational modeling framework to molecular design optimization and clinical benchmarking for TCEs. This framework can be employed to other targets to provide a quantitative means to facilitate the model-informed best in class TCE discovery and development. Author summaryCytotoxic T cells play a crucial role in eliminating tumor cells. However, tumor cells develop mechanisms to evade from T cell recognition. Bispecific T cell engager (TCE) is designed to overcome this issue with bringing T cells to close proximity of tumor cells through simultaneous bivalent binding to both tumor-associated antigen and T cells. After successful regulatory approval of blinatumomab (anti-CD19 TCE), more than 40 TCEs are currently in clinical development with a variety of molecular size and protein formats. In this study, we developed a quantitative computational modeling framework for molecular design optimization and clinical benchmarking of TCEs. The model accounts for molecular size dependent biodistribution of TCEs to tumor tissue and other organs as well as following bispecific intercellular bridging of T cells and tumor cells. The model simulation highlighted the importance of binding selectivity of TCEs to tumor cell surface target over shed target. The model also demonstrated a good agreement in predicted immune synapse number for two distinct molecular formats of TCEs at their respective clinically efficacious dose levels, highlighting the usefulness of developed computational modeling framework for best in class TCE discovery and development.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
8
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%