A two-step metagenomics approach for prey identification from the blood meals of common vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus)
Chua, P. Y. S.; Caroe, C.; Crampton-Platt, A.; Reyes-Avila, C. S.; Jones, G.; Streicker, D. G.; Bohmann, K.
Show abstract
The feeding behaviour of the sanguivorous common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) facilitates the transmission of pathogens that can impact both human and animal health. To formulate effective strategies in controlling the spread of diseases, there is a need to obtain information on which animals they feed on. One DNA-based approach, shotgun sequencing, can be used to obtain such information. Even though it is costly, shotgun sequencing can be used to simultaneously retrieve prey and vampire bat mitochondrial DNA for population studies within one round of sequencing. However, due to the challenges of analysing shotgun sequenced metagenomic data such as false negatives/positives and typically low proportion of reads mapped to diet items, shotgun sequencing has not been used for the identification of prey from common vampire bat blood meals. To overcome these challenges and generate longer mitochondrial contigs which could be useful for prey population studies, we shotgun sequenced common vampire bat blood meal samples (n=8) and utilised a two-step metagenomic approach based on combining existing bioinformatic workflows (alignment and de novo mtDNA assembly) to identify prey. Further, we validated our results to detections made through metabarcoding. We accurately identified the common vampire bats prey in seven out of eight samples without any false positives. We also generated prey mitochondrial contig lengths between 138bp to 3231bp (mean=985bp, SD=981bp). As we develop more computationally efficient bioinformatics pipelines and reduce sequencing costs, we can expect an uptake in metagenomics dietary studies in the near future.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MitoFinder: efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics 94%
- A snakemake toolkit for the batch assembly, annotation, and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial genomes and ribosomal genes from genome skims of museum collections. 94%
- Next-generation snow leopard population assessment tool: multiplex-PCR SNP panel for individual identification from feces 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitochondrial genomes of Columbicola feather lice are highly fragmented, indicating repeated evolution of minicircle-type genomes in parasitic lice 94%
- The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) based on long-read nanopore sequencing 93%
- Nuclear eDNA Metabarcoding Primers for Anthozoan Coral Biodiversity Assessment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- BirT: a novel primer pair for avian environmental DNA metabarcoding 95%
- Foraging niche partitioning of three Myotis bat species and marine fish consumption by Myotis pilosus in a subtropical East Asian region 94%
- Molecular dietary analyses of western capercaillies (Tetrao urogallus) reveal a diverse diet 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- In silico and empirical evaluation of twelve COI & 16S metabarcoding primer sets for insectivorous diet analyses 95%
- DNA metabarcoding successfully quantifies relative abundances of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: a validation study using camera-recorded diets 95%
- Library preparation method and DNA source influence endogenous DNA recovery from 100-year-old avian museum specimens 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maximizing the reliability and the number of species assignments in metabarcoding studies 93%
- The bacterial hitchhiker's guide to COI: Universal primer-based COI capture probes fail to exclude bacterial DNA, but 16S capture leaves metazoa behind 92%
- Bacteria are everywhere, even in your COI marker gene data! 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.