Back

Modulation of behavioral and hippocampal transcriptomic responses in rat prolonged chronic unpredictable stress model by fluoxetine, eicosapentaenoic acid and lipopolysaccharide

Demin, K. A.; Kolesnikova, T. O.; Galstyan, D. S.; Krotova, N. A.; Ilyin, N. P.; Derzhavina, K. A.; Seredinskaya, M.; Kositsyn, Y. M.; Sorokin, D. V.; Nerush, M. O.; Khaybaev, A.-A. S.; Pushkareva, S. A.; Strekalova, T.; Masharsky, A.; Kalueff, A. V.

2021-12-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.12.05.471274 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animal models are widely used to study stress-induced affective disorders and associated with them neuroinflammation and other neuroimmune processes. Here, we examined rat behavioral and hippocampal transcriptomic responses to prolonged chronic unpredictable stress (PCUS), as well as following a 4-week treatment with a classical antidepressant fluoxetine, an anti-inflammatory agent eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), a pro-inflammatory agent lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and their combinations. Overall, PCUS evoked an anxiety-like behavioral phenotype in rats (corrected by chronic fluoxetine alone or combined with other drugs), EPA was anxiolytic and LPS promoted anxiety in this model. PCUS evoked pronounced transcriptomic responses in rat hippocampi, including >200 differentially expressed genes. While pharmacological manipulations did not affect hippocampal gene expression markedly, Gpr6, Drd2 and Adora2a were downregulated in stressed rats treated with fluoxetine+EPA, suggesting G protein-coupled receptor 6, dopamine D2 receptor and adenosine A2A receptor as potential evolutionarily conserved targets in chronic stress. Overall, these findings support the validity of rat PCUS paradigm as a useful tool to study stress-related affective pathologies and calls for further research probing how various conventional and novel drugs modulate behavioral and neurotranscriptomic biomarkers of chronic stress.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.