A novel paradigm for optimal mass feature peak picking in large scale LC-MS datasets using the isopair: isoLock, autoCredential and anovAlign
Hubbard, A. H.; Connelly, L.; Kambhampati, S.; Evans, B.; Baxter, I.
Show abstract
Untargeted metabolomics enables direct quantification of metabolites without apriori knowledge of their identity. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), a popular method to implement untargeted metabolomics, identifies metabolites via combined mass/charge (m/z) and retention time as mass features. Improvements in the sensitivity of mass spectrometers has increased the complexity of data produced, leading to computational obstacles. One outstanding challenge is calling metabolite mass feature peaks rapidly and accurately in large LC-MS datasets (dozens to thousands of samples) in the presence of measurement and other noise. While existing algorithms are useful, they have limitations that become pronounced at scale and lead to false positive metabolite predictions as well as signal dropouts. To overcome some of these shortcomings, biochemists have developed hybrid computational and carbon labeling techniques, such as credentialing. Credentialing can validate metabolite signals, but is laborious and its applicability is limited. We have developed a suite of three computational tools to overcome the challenges of unreliable algorithms and inefficient validation protocols: isolock, autoCredential and anovAlign. Isolock uses isopairs, or metabolite-istopologue pairs, to calculate and correct for mass drift noise across LC-MS runs. autoCredential leverages statistical features of LC-MS data to amplify naturally present 13C isotopologues and validate metabolites through isopairs. This obviates the need to artificially introduce carbon labeling. anovAlign, an anova-derived algorithm, is used to align retention time windows across samples to accurately delineate retention time windows for mass features. Using a large published clinical dataset as well as a plant dataset with biological replicates across time, genotype and treatment, we demonstrate that this suite of tools is more sensitive and reproducible than both an open source metabolomics pipelines, XCMS, and the commercial software progenesis QI. This software suite opens a new era for enhanced accuracy and increased throughput for untargeted metabolomics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scan-Centric, Frequency-Based Method for Characterizing Peaks from Direct Injection Fourier transform Mass Spectrometry Experiments 97%
- WiPP: Workflow for improved Peak Picking for Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) data 96%
- Screening for inborn errors of metabolism using untargeted metabolomics and out-of-batch controls 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid QC-MS - Interactive Dashboard for Synchronous Mass Spectrometry Data Acquisition Quality Control 97%
- Met-ID: An Open-Source Software for Comprehensive Annotation of Multiple On-Tissue Chemical Modifications in MALDI-MSI 96%
- Rapid Development of Improved Data-dependent Acquisition Strategies. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved open modification searching via unified spectral search with predicted libraries and enhanced vector representations in ANN-SoLo 96%
- MSnbase, efficient and elegant R-based processing and visualisation of raw mass spectrometry data 96%
- rawR - Direct access to raw mass spectrometry data in R 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.