Post-Vaccination Symptoms after A Third Dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Li, D.; Cheng, S.; Debbas, P.; Braun, J.; McGovern, D. P. B.; Melmed, G. Y.; CORALE-IBD Study Group,
Show abstract
Symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 primary vaccination among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are generally of similar frequency, severity, and duration to those reported in the general population. The symptom profile after a 3rd mRNA vaccine dose in the predominantly immune-compromised IBD population is unknown. We aimed to assess symptomology after a 3rd or booster dose of mRNA vaccination in adults with IBD. We surveyed participants of the Coronavirus Risk Associations and Longitudinal Evaluation in IBD (CORALE-IBD) post-vaccination registry for symptom frequency and severity after a 3rd mRNA vaccine dose in an observational cohort study. In total, 524 participants (70% female, mean age 45 years) reported a third dose of mRNA vaccination through October 11, 2021. Overall, 41% reported symptoms after a third dose, with symptoms generally more frequent and more severe among participants younger than 55 years. The most frequent postvaccination symptoms were injection site pain (39%), fatigue or malaise (34%), and headache (23%). These symptoms were all less frequently reported after dose 3 than after dose 2. Gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by 8.8%, which was slightly more frequent than after dose 2 (7.8%). Those with severe symptoms after dose 2 were more likely to have severe symptoms after dose 3. These findings can reassure the IBD patient and provider communities that the likelihood and distribution of symptoms after a third mRNA vaccine dose are generally similar to those after a second dose, and that the frequency of postvaccination symptoms after dose 3 are generally lower than after dose 2.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Humoral Immunogenicity of Three COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Doses in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease 96%
- Seroconversion following SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Vaccination in Pediatric IBD Patients 94%
- Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 after Infection or Vaccination in Children and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse Events Following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease 97%
- Effectiveness and Safety of Combining Tofacitinib with a Biologic in Patients with Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 92%
- Appropriate management of steroids and discharge planning during and after hospital admission for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serological Response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Biologic Therapies; A Multi-Center Prospective Study 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Dose Willingness Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Infliximab and Vedolizumab: A Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Infliximab is associated with attenuated immunogenicity to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines 94%
- Maintenance therapy with infliximab or vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: UK experience in the 2020 pandemic 90%
- Optimising Early Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologics Era: Admission Model for Intensification of Therapy in Acute Severe Colitis (ADMIT–ASC) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of symptom trajectory in newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis: a 3-year follow-up cohort study 91%
- Re-evaluating the evidence for fecal microbiota transplantation "super-donors" in inflammatory bowel disease 91%
- An extremes of phenotype approach confirms significant genetic heterogeneity in patients with ulcerative colitis. 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.