Back

Assessment of Sex Bias in Housekeeping Gene Expression in Adipose Tissue Through the Massive Analysis of Transcriptomics Data

Guaita-Cespedes, M.; Grillo-Risco, R.; Hidalgo, M. R.; Fernandez-Veledo, S.; Burks, D. J.; de la Iglesia-Vaya, M.; Galan, A.; Garcia-Garcia, F.

2022-04-05 genomics
10.1101/2021.12.04.471124 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAs the housekeeping genes (HKG) generally involved in maintaining essential cell functions are typically assumed to exhibit constant expression levels across cell types, they are commonly employed as internal controls in gene expression studies. Nevertheless, HKG may vary gene expression profile according to different variables introducing systematic errors into experimental results. Sex bias can indeed affect expression display, however, up to date, sex has not been typically considered as a biological variable. MethodsIn this study, we evaluate the expression profiles of six classical housekeeping genes (four metabolic: GAPDH, HPRT, PPIA, and UBC, and two ribosomal: 18S and RPL19) to determine expression stability in adipose tissues (AT) of Homo sapiens and Mus musculus and check sex bias and their overall suitability as internal controls. We also assess the expression stability of all genes included in distinct whole-transcriptome microarrays available from the Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify sex-unbiased housekeeping genes (suHKG) suitable for use as internal controls. We perform a novel computational strategy based on meta-analysis techniques to identify any sexual dimorphisms in mRNA expression stability in AT and to properly validate potential candidates. ResultsJust above half of the considered studies informed properly about the sex of the human samples, however, not enough female mouse samples were found to be included in this analysis. We found differences in the HKG expression stability in humans between female and male samples, with females presenting greater instability. We propose a suHKG signature including experimentally validated classical HKG like PPIA and RPL19 and novel potential markers for human AT and discarding others like the extensively used 18S gene due to a sex-based variability display in adipose tissue. Orthologs have also been assayed and proposed for mouse WAT suHKG signature. All results generated during this study are readily available by accessing an open web resource (https://bioinfo.cipf.es/metafun-HKG) for consultation and reuse in further studies. ConclusionsThis sex-based research proves that certain classical housekeeping genes fail to function adequately as controls when analyzing human adipose tissue considering sex as a variable. We confirm RPL19 and PPIA suitability as sex-unbiased human and mouse housekeeping genes derived from sex-specific expression profiles, and propose new ones such as RPS8 and UBB. HighlightsO_LIA computational strategy based on massive data analysis revealed that an accurate experimental design for adipose tissue requires the adequate selection of a sex-unbiased housekeeping genes (HKG). C_LIO_LIThe extensively used 18S gene displays sex-based variability in adipose tissue, although PPIA and RPL19 do not, and hence, represent robust HKG. C_LIO_LINew sex-unbiased human and mouse candidate HKG: RPS8 and UBB. C_LIO_LImetafun-HKG (https://bioinfo.cipf.es/metafun-HKG): a freely available web tool to allow users to review stable expression levels of candidate HKG along the large volume of FAIR data. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.5%
2
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
5
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Gene Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
25
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%