Back

Urine as a non-invasive alternative to blood for germline and somatic mutation detection in hepatocellular carcinoma

Kim, A. K.; Lin, S. Y.; Jin, S.; Cui, Y.; Gade, T. P.; Shieh, F.-S.; Chao, M.; Shieh, J.; Cheng, J.; Hamilton, J. P.; Hann, H.-W.; Goryunov, D.; Wang, Z.; Su, Y.-h.

2021-12-05 gastroenterology
10.1101/2021.12.03.21266943 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & AimsCell-free DNA (cfDNA) has advanced cancer genetic profiling through liquid biopsy. While plasma is traditionally the primary source, emerging evidence highlights urinary cfDNA as a novel and noninvasive alternative. This study aimed to comprehensively assess transrenal DNA (trDNA) as a novel noninvasive biomarker source in HCC patients, compared to blood-based liquid biopsy. Approach & ResultsHBV DNA was used as a biomarker for trDNA. HBV-targeted and HCC-focused next generation sequencing (NGS) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were used to compare fragment insert-sizes, the genome coverage, and germline genotyping accuracy. Urinary cfDNA overall exhibited a predominantly mononucelosomal pattern similar to plasma cfDNA, but with shorter fragments, broader size distribution and a more pronounced 10-bp periodicity. In contrast, trDNA were shorter and more variable among all patients. In HCC patients, trDNA was even shorter, with distinct 4-mer end motifs, compared to non-HCC trDNA. Higher concentrations of HCC-distinctive 4-mer end motif and TP53 mutations were found in urine compared to plasma. The overall genome coverage breadth by WGS was similar between urine and plasma cfDNA, with a higher fraction of covered cancer-associated mutation hotspots in urine cfDNA. In 101 HCC patients, there was a 78% overall concordance of HCC-associated mutations (TP53, CTNNB1, and hTERT) and in select 15 patients, 97% overall position-level concordance by targeted NGS between plasma and urine cfDNA. ConclusionUrine cfDNA has comparable features with distinct characteristics to plasma cfDNA and is a promising tool for liver cancer studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
3
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.1%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
12
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%