Back

Urine as a non-invasive alternative to blood for germline and somatic mutation detection in hepatocellular carcinoma

Kim, A. K.; Lin, S. Y.; Jin, S.; Cui, Y.; Gade, T. P.; Shieh, F.-S.; Chao, M.; Shieh, J.; Cheng, J.; Hamilton, J. P.; Hann, H.-W.; Goryunov, D.; Wang, Z.; Su, Y.-h.

2021-12-05 gastroenterology
10.1101/2021.12.03.21266943 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & AimsCell-free DNA (cfDNA) has advanced cancer genetic profiling through liquid biopsy. While plasma is traditionally the primary source, emerging evidence highlights urinary cfDNA as a novel and noninvasive alternative. This study aimed to comprehensively assess transrenal DNA (trDNA) as a novel noninvasive biomarker source in HCC patients, compared to blood-based liquid biopsy. Approach & ResultsHBV DNA was used as a biomarker for trDNA. HBV-targeted and HCC-focused next generation sequencing (NGS) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were used to compare fragment insert-sizes, the genome coverage, and germline genotyping accuracy. Urinary cfDNA overall exhibited a predominantly mononucelosomal pattern similar to plasma cfDNA, but with shorter fragments, broader size distribution and a more pronounced 10-bp periodicity. In contrast, trDNA were shorter and more variable among all patients. In HCC patients, trDNA was even shorter, with distinct 4-mer end motifs, compared to non-HCC trDNA. Higher concentrations of HCC-distinctive 4-mer end motif and TP53 mutations were found in urine compared to plasma. The overall genome coverage breadth by WGS was similar between urine and plasma cfDNA, with a higher fraction of covered cancer-associated mutation hotspots in urine cfDNA. In 101 HCC patients, there was a 78% overall concordance of HCC-associated mutations (TP53, CTNNB1, and hTERT) and in select 15 patients, 97% overall position-level concordance by targeted NGS between plasma and urine cfDNA. ConclusionUrine cfDNA has comparable features with distinct characteristics to plasma cfDNA and is a promising tool for liver cancer studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.