Back

Tandem WW/PPxY motif interactions in WWOX: the multifaceted role of the second WW domain

Rotem-Bamberger, S.; Fahoum, J.; Keinan-Adamsky, K.; Tsaban, T.; Avraham, O.; Shalev, D. E.; Chill, J. H.; Schueler-Furman, O.

2021-12-01 biophysics
10.1101/2021.12.01.470705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Class I WW domains mediate protein interactions by binding short linear PPxY motifs. They occur predominantly as tandem repeats, and their target proteins often contain multiple PPxY motifs, but the interplay of WW/peptide interactions is not always intuitive. WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) protein harbors two WW domains: unstable WW1 capable of PPxY binding, and well-folded but mutated WW2 that cannot bind such motifs. WW2 is considered to act as a WW1 chaperone, but the underlying mechanism remains to be revealed. Here we combine NMR, ITC and structural modeling to elucidate the role of both WW domains in WWOX binding to single and double motif peptides derived from its substrate ErbB4. Using NMR we identified an interaction surface between the two domains that supports a WWOX conformation that is compatible with peptide substrate binding. ITC and NMR measurements reveal that while binding affinity to a single motif is marginally increased in the presence of WW2, affinity to a dual motif peptide increases tenfold, and that WW2 can directly bind double motif-peptides using its canonical binding site. Finally, differential binding of peptides in a mutagenesis study is consistent with a parallel orientation binding to the WW1-WW2 tandem domain, agreeing with structural models of the interaction. Our results reveal the complex nature of tandem WW domain organization and substrate binding, highlighting the contribution of WWOX WW2 to both stability and binding. This opens the way to assess how evolution can utilize the multivariate nature of binding to fine-tune interactions for specific biological functions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.