Back

Interpreting dN/dS under different selective regimes in cancer evolution

Perez-Figueroa, A.; Posada, D.

2021-12-01 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.11.30.470556 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The standard relationship between the dN/dS statistic and the selection coefficient is contingent upon the computation of the rate of fixation of non-synonymous and synonymous mutations among divergent lineages (substitutions). In cancer genomics, however, dN/dS is typically calculated by including mutations that are still segregating in the cell population. The interpretation of dN/dS within sexual populations has been shown to be problematic. Here we used a simple model of somatic evolution to study the relationship between dN/dS and the selection coefficient in the presence of deleterious, neutral, and beneficial mutations in cancer. We found that dN/dS can be used to distinguish cancer genes under positive or negative selection, but it is not always informative about the magnitude of the selection coefficient. In particular, under the asexual scenario simulated, dN/dS is insensitive to negative selection strength. Furthermore, the relationship between dN/dS and the positive selection coefficient depends on the mutation detection threshold, and, in particular scenarios, it can become non-linear. Our results warn about the necessary caution when interpreting the results drawn from dN/dS estimates in cancer.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.