HARLEY: A Semi-Automated detection of foci in fluorescence images of yeast
Shabanov, I.; Buchan, J. R.
Show abstract
Quantification of cellular structures in fluorescence microscopy data is a key means of understanding cellular function. Unfortunately, numerous cellular structures present unique challenges in their ability to be unbiasedly and accurately detected and quantified. In our studies on stress granules in yeast, users displayed a striking variation of up to 3.7-fold in foci calls and were only able to replicate their results with 62-78% correlation, when requantifying the same images. To facilitate consistent results we developed HARLEY (Human Augmented Recognition of LLPS Ensembles in Yeast), a customizable software for detection and quantification of stress granules in S.cerevisiae. After a brief model training on ~20 cells the detection of foci is fully automated and based on closed loops in intensity contours, constrained only by the a-priori known size of the features of interest. Since no shape is implied, this method is not limited to round features, as is often the case with other algorithms. Candidate features are annotated with a set of geometrical and intensity-based properties to train a kernel Support Vector Machine to recognize features of interest. The trained classifier is then used to create consistent results across datasets. HARLEY is aimed at users without technical expertise, allows for batch processing and is freely available, which should be of broad interest to users focused on analysis of microscopy data in yeast.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- LLAMA: a robust and scalable machine learning pipeline for analysis of cellsurface projections in large scale 4D microscopy data 97%
- petiteFinder: An automated computer vision tool to compute Petite colony frequencies in baker's yeast 96%
- CellProfiler 4: Improvements in Speed, Utility and Usability 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.