Back

The regeneration factors ERF114 and ERF115 act as transducers of mechanical cues to developmental pathways

Canher, B.; Lanssens, F.; Zhang, A.; Bisht, A.; Mazumdar, S.; Heyman, J.; Augstein, F.; Wolf, S.; Carlsbecker, A.; Melnyk, C. W.; De Veylder, L.

2021-11-30 plant biology
10.1101/2021.11.29.470368 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants show an unparalleled regenerative capacity, allowing them to survive severe stress conditions, such as injury, herbivory attack and harsh weather conditions. This potential not only replenishes tissues and restores damaged organs, but can also give rise to whole plant bodies, highlighting the intertwined nature of development and regeneration. It suggests that regeneration and developmental processes respond to the same upstream signals, but how a cell knows which of the two processes to engage is currently unknown. Here, we demonstrate that next to being regulators of regeneration, ETHYENE RESPONSE FACTOR 114 (ERF114) and ERF115 govern developmental growth in the absence of wounding or injury. Increased ERF114 and ERF115 activity is correlated with enhanced xylem maturation and lateral root formation, whereas their knockout results in a decrease in lateral roots and xylem connectivity following grafting. Moreover, we provide evidence that mechanical cues contribute to ERF114 and ERF115 expression in correlation with BZR1 mediated brassinosteroid signaling under both regenerative and developmental conditions. Antagonistically, negative regulation of cell wall extensibility via cell wall-associated mechanosensory FERONIA signaling suppresses their expression under both conditions. Our data suggest a molecular framework in which mechanical perturbations too great to be compensated by adaptive cell wall remodeling results in strong ERF114 and ERF115 expression, switching their role from developmental to regenerative regulators. One-Sentence SummaryMechanical cues drive ERF114/ERF115 expression during lateral root development as well as regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.