Effectiveness of a third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine for preventing post-vaccination COVID-19 infection: an observational study
Sharma, A.; Oda, G.; Holodniy, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundBNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines are highly protective against COVID-19. Concern about waning immunity and reduced effectiveness against SARS-COV-2 variants led to use of a third dose six months after completing the primary series. We used data from the Veterans Health Administration to evaluate the effectiveness of a third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 compared to the primary series in preventing post-vaccination COVID-19. MethodsDuring January 1 - November 25, 2021, third dose recipients were matched (1:1) to demographically similar controls who did not receive a third dose. Eligible participants had completed the primary series at least six months (180 days) before recruitment date and had received at least one SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Long-term care residents were excluded. Primary outcomes were documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalization. Effectiveness was estimated as 1-incidence rate ratio. FindingsFollowing matching, the BNT162b2 group included 74,032 pairs and the mRNA-1273 group included 55,098 pairs. In BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 groups, median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR]: 64-75) and 72 (IQR: 66-77) years, 69,426 (93.8%) and 52,241 (94.8%) were male, and 43,039 (58.1%) and 37,218 (67.5%) were non-Hispanic White, respectively. Effectiveness of a third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 compared to the primary series was 45.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.9-52.5%) and 46.6% (95% CI: 36.4-55.3%) for documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and 44.8% (95% CI: 26.6-58.4%) and 50.0% (95% CI: 26.2-66.1%) for COVID-19 hospitalization, respectively. InterpretationA third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 is moderately effective against post-vaccination COVID-19 infection compared to the primary series. FundingNone.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 98%
- Relative effectiveness of booster vs. 2-dose mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in the Veterans Health Administration: Self-controlled risk interval analysis 97%
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 among adults aged ≥65 years in the United States 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protection offered by mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 in Qatar 97%
- Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) infection in Qatar 97%
- Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Booster Vaccinations – Preliminary Report 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalization and death in Canada: A multiprovincial test-negative design study 96%
- Single-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers extending 16 weeks post-vaccination: a test-negative design from Quebec, Canada 95%
- Two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness with mixed schedules and extended dosing intervals: test-negative design studies from British Columbia and Quebec, Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in the elderly population during a P.1 variant-associated epidemic of COVID-19 in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study 96%
- Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort 96%
- Clinical Severity and mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness for Omicron, Delta, and Alpha SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the United States: A Prospective Observational Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of CoronaVac in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant transmission in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study 95%
- Time-Varying Effectiveness of Three Covid-19 Vaccines in Puerto Rico 95%
- Vaccination reduces need for emergency care in breakthrough COVID-19 infections: A multicenter cohort study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.