The online delivery of exercise oncology classes supported with health coaching: A pilot randomized controlled trial
Eisele, M.; Twomey, R.; Pohl, A. J.; McDonough, M. H.; McNeely, M. L.; Ester, M.; Daun, J. T.; Culos-Reed, N. S.
Show abstract
PurposeThe primary objective was to investigate the feasibility of a synchronous, online delivered, group-based, supervised, exercise oncology maintenance program supported with health coaching. MethodsAll participants had previously completed a 12-week group-based exercise study. In the current study, participants were randomized to a 12-week exercise oncology maintenance class with or without health coaching. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed as intervention attendance, safety and fidelity, study recruitment, attrition and outcome assessment completion. Additionally, semi-structured interviews at the end of the intervention provided participants perspectives on intervention feasibility. ResultsForty participants (n8WK=25; n12WK=15) enrolled in the study. Feasibility was confirmed for recruitment rate (42.6%), attrition rate (2.5%), safety (no adverse events), health coaching attendance (97%), health coaching fidelity (96.7%), class attendance (91.2%), class fidelity (92.6%), and assessment completion (questionnaire=98.8%; physical functioning=97.5%). Based on the qualitative feedback, feasibility was facilitated by the convenience, while the diminished ability to connect with other participants online was a drawback compared to in-person delivery. ConclusionThe synchronous online delivery of an exercise oncology maintenance class, the additional health coaching support, and the tools used to measure the intervention effectiveness were feasible for individuals living with and beyond cancer.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study 94%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 94%
- Anatomy of a Failure: Can a Cognitive-Bias Modification Intervention Improve Physical Activity in Patients Following a Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 95%
- Evaluating the effectiveness of mindfulness alone compared to exercise and mindfulness on fatigue in women with gynaecology cancer (GEMS): Protocol for a randomised feasibility trial 95%
- Feasibility of individualized home exercise programs for patients with head and neck cancer – study protocol and first results of a multicentre single-arm intervention trial (OSHO #94) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 91%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 90%
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of guided self-help Behavioral Activation intervention for geriatric depression 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 90%
- ReachUHC: A randomized controlled trial study protocol of a mobile phone-based reminder and automatic renewal intervention to increase health insurance renewal rates in Kumasi, Ghana 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.