Random clonal expansion as a limiting factor in transplantable in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 screens
Lee, T. W.; Hunter, F. W.; Wilson, W. R.; Jamieson, S. M.
Show abstract
Transplantable in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens, in which cells are transduced in vitro and inoculated into mice to form tumours in vivo, offer the opportunity to evaluate gene function in a cancer model that incorporates the multicellular interactions of the tumour microenvironment. In this study, we sought to develop a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumour xenograft model for whole-genome screens that could maintain high gRNA representation during tumour initiation and progression. To achieve this, we sought early-passage HNSCC cell lines with a high frequency of tumour initiation-cells, and identified the pseudodiploid UT-SCC-54C line as a suitable model from 23 HNSCC lines tested based on a low tumourigenic dose for 50% takes (TD50) of 1100 cells in NSG mice. On transduction with the GeCKOv2 whole-genome gRNA library (119,461 unique gRNAs), high (80-95%) gRNA representation was maintained in early (up to 14 d) UT-SCC-54C tumours in NSG mice, but not in UT-SCC-74B tumours (TD50=9200). However, loss of gRNA representation was observed in UT-SCC-54C tumours following growth for 38-43 days, which correlated with a large increase in bias among gRNA read counts due to stochastic expansion of clones in the tumours. Applying binomial thinning simulations revealed that the UT-SCC-54C model would have 40-90% statistical power to detect drug sensitivity genes with log2 fold change effect sizes of 1-2 in early tumours with gRNA libraries of up to 10,000 gRNAs and modest group sizes of 5 tumours. In large tumours, this model would have had 45% power to detect log2 fold change effect sizes of 2-3 with libraries of 2,000 gRNAs and 14 tumours per group. Based on our findings, we conclude that gRNA library size, sample size and tumour size are all parameters that can be individually optimised to ensure transplantable in vivo CRISPR screens can successfully evaluate gene function.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplex enCas12a screens show functional buffering by paralogs is systematically absent from genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens 94%
- Single cell decoding of drug induced transcriptomic reprogramming in triple negative breast cancers 94%
- RNA allelic frequencies of somatic mutations encode substantial functional information in cancers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer LncRNA Census 2 (CLC2): an enhanced resource reveals clinical features of cancer lncRNAs 94%
- Barcoded Competitive Clone-Initiating Cell (BC-CIC) Analysis Reveals Differences in Ovarian Cancer Cell Genotype and Niche Specific Clonal Fitness During Growth and Metastasis In Vivo 94%
- Analysis of gene expression and mutation data points on contribution of transcription to the mutagenesis by APOBEC enzymes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An NKX2-1/ERK/WNT feedback loop modulates gastric identity and response to targeted therapy in lung adenocarcinoma 94%
- Co-regulation and functional cooperativity of FOXM1 and RHNO1 bidirectional genes in ovarian cancer 94%
- Systematic lncRNA mapping to genome-wide co-essential pathways uncovers cancer dependency on uncharacterized lncRNAs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.