Back

Digital exclusion predicts worse mental health among adolescents during COVID-19

Metherell, T. E.; Ghai, S.; McCormick, E. M.; Ford, T. J.; Orben, A.

2021-12-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2021.11.25.21266853 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSocial isolation is strongly associated with poor mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing social restrictions disrupted young peoples social interactions and resulted in several periods during which school closures necessitated online learning. We hypothesise that digitally excluded young people would demonstrate greater deterioration in their mental health than their digitally connected peers during this time. MethodsWe analysed representative mental health data from a sample of UK 10-15-year-olds (N = 1387); Understanding Society collected the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 2017-19 and thrice during the pandemic (July 2020, November 2020 and March 2021). We employed cross-sectional methods and longitudinal latent growth curve modelling to describe trajectories of adolescent mental health for participants with and without access to a computer or a good internet connection for schoolwork. OutcomesAdolescent mental health had a quadratic trajectory during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the highest mean Total Difficulties score around December 2020. The worsening and recovery of mental health during the pandemic was greatly pronounced among those without access to a computer, although we did not find evidence for a similar effect among those without a good internet connection. InterpretationDigital exclusion, as indicated by lack of access to a computer, is a tractable risk factor that likely compounds other adversities facing children and young people during periods of social isolation. FundingBritish Psychological Society; School of the Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge; NIHR Applied Research Centre; Medical Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; and Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
3
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.8%
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.8%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
14
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%