Digital exclusion predicts worse mental health among adolescents during COVID-19
Metherell, T. E.; Ghai, S.; McCormick, E. M.; Ford, T. J.; Orben, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSocial isolation is strongly associated with poor mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing social restrictions disrupted young peoples social interactions and resulted in several periods during which school closures necessitated online learning. We hypothesise that digitally excluded young people would demonstrate greater deterioration in their mental health than their digitally connected peers during this time. MethodsWe analysed representative mental health data from a sample of UK 10-15-year-olds (N = 1387); Understanding Society collected the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 2017-19 and thrice during the pandemic (July 2020, November 2020 and March 2021). We employed cross-sectional methods and longitudinal latent growth curve modelling to describe trajectories of adolescent mental health for participants with and without access to a computer or a good internet connection for schoolwork. OutcomesAdolescent mental health had a quadratic trajectory during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the highest mean Total Difficulties score around December 2020. The worsening and recovery of mental health during the pandemic was greatly pronounced among those without access to a computer, although we did not find evidence for a similar effect among those without a good internet connection. InterpretationDigital exclusion, as indicated by lack of access to a computer, is a tractable risk factor that likely compounds other adversities facing children and young people during periods of social isolation. FundingBritish Psychological Society; School of the Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge; NIHR Applied Research Centre; Medical Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; and Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding priorities and needs for child and adolescent mental health in Greece from multiple informants: an open resource 94%
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 93%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental healthcare consultations among children and adolescents in Norway: a nationwide registry study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vulnerabilities in child wellbeing among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on anxiety and depression symptoms of young people in the Global South: evidence from a four-country cohort study 93%
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of clinically extremely vulnerable children and children living with clinically extremely vulnerable people in Wales: A data linkage study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 94%
- Mental and social health of children and adolescents with pre-existing mental or somatic problems during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown 93%
- Use of the Internet and digital devices among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological distress among people with probable COVID-19 infection: analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study 93%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 93%
- The impact of the COVID19 pandemic and initial period of lockdown on the mental health and wellbeing of UK adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social and Mental Health Pathways to Institutional Trust: A Cohort Study 93%
- Loneliness during strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 adults in the UK 92%
- COVID-19, economic downturn, and long-term trajectories of population mental health: evidence from two nationally representative British birth cohorts at the intersection of gender and socioeconomic position 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.