Back

Pulse-Width Modulation-based TMS mimics effects of conventional TMS on human primary motor cortex

Memarian Sorkhabi, M.; Wendt, K.; Oshea, J.; Denison, T.

2021-11-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.11.24.469832 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSWe developed a novel transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) device to generate flexible stimuli and patterns. The system synthesizes digital equivalents of analog waveforms, relying on the filtering properties of the nervous system. Here, we test the hypothesis that the novel pulses can mimic the effect of conventional pulses on the cortex. ApproachA second-generation programmable TMS (pTMS2) stimulator with magnetic pulse shaping capabilities using pulse-width modulation (PWM) was tested. A computational and an in-human study on twelve healthy participants compared the neuronal effects of conventional and modulation-based stimuli. Main resultsBoth the computational modeling and the in-human stimulation showed that the PWM-based system can synthesize pulses to effectively stimulate the human brain, equivalent to conventional stimulators. The comparison includes motor threshold, MEP latency and input-output curve measurements. SignificancePWM stimuli can fundamentally imitate the effect of conventional magnetic stimuli while adding considerable flexibility to TMS systems, enabling the generation of highly configurable TMS protocols. HO_SCPLOWIGHLIGHTSC_SCPLOWO_LIThe PWM method promises the implementation of flexible neurostimulation C_LIO_LIPWM magnetic pulses were well tolerated by the participants without adverse events C_LIO_LIRMTs and MEPs were compared for PWM and conventional stimuli C_LIO_LIPWM-equivalent of conventional pulses has relatively similar effects on the cortex C_LIO_LIThe use of digital synthesis techniques to create novel patterns is a promising method for future neuromodulation C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.