Back

Quasi-universal scaling in mouse-brain neuronal activity stems from edge-of-instability critical dynamics

B. Morales, G.; Di Santo, S.; Munoz, M. A.

2021-11-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.11.23.469734 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brain is in a state of perpetual reverberant neural activity, even in the absence of specific tasks or stimuli. Shedding light on the origin and functional significance of such a dynamical state is essential to understanding how the brain transmits, processes, and stores information. An inspiring, albeit controversial, conjecture proposes that some statistical characteristics of empirically observed neuronal activity can be understood by assuming that brain networks operate in a dynamical regime near the edge of a phase transition. Moreover, the resulting critical behavior, with its concomitant scale invariance, is assumed to carry crucial functional advantages. Here, we present a data-driven analysis based on simultaneous high-throughput recordings of the activity of thousands of individual neurons in various regions of the mouse brain. To analyze these data, we synergistically combine cutting-edge methods for the study of brain activity (such as a phenomenological renormalization group approach and techniques that infer the general dynamical state of a neural population), while designing complementary tools. This strategy allows us to uncover strong signatures of scale invariance that is "quasi-universal" across brain regions and reveal that all these areas operate, to a greater or lesser extent, near the edge of instability. Furthermore, this framework allows us to distinguish between quasi-universal background activity and non-universal input-related activity. Taken together, this study provides strong evidence that brain networks actually operate in a critical regime which, among other functional advantages, provides them with a scale-invariant substrate of activity covariances that can sustain optimal input representations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
18.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
3
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.6%
5
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.7%
11
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
13
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
20
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%