Back

Chemo-mechanical Diffusion Waves Orchestrate Collective Dynamics of Immune Cell Podosomes

Gong, Z.; van den Dries, K.; Cambi, A.; Shenoy, V.

2021-11-24 biophysics
10.1101/2021.11.23.469591 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immune cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, can utilize podosomes, actin-rich protrusions, to generate forces, migrate, and patrol for foreign antigens. In these cells, individual podosomes exhibit periodic protrusion and retraction cycles (vertical oscillations) to probe their microenvironment, while multiple podosomes arranged in clusters demonstrate coordinated wave-like spatiotemporal dynamics. However, the mechanisms governing both the individual vertical oscillations and the coordinated oscillation waves in clusters remain unclear. By integrating actin polymerization, myosin contractility, actin diffusion, and mechanosensitive signaling, we develop a chemo-mechanical model for both the oscillatory growth of individual podosomes and wave-like dynamics in clusters. Our model reveals that podosomes show oscillatory growth when the actin polymerization-associated protrusion and the signaling-associated myosin contraction occur at similar rates, while the diffusion of actin monomers within the cluster drives mesoscale coordination of individual podosome oscillations in an apparent wave-like fashion. Our model predicts the influence of different pharmacological treatments targeting myosin activity, actin polymerization, and mechanosensitive pathways, as well as the impact of the microenvironment stiffness on the wavelengths, frequencies, and speeds of the chemo-mechanical waves. Overall, our integrated theoretical and experimental approach reveals how collective wave dynamics arise due to the coupling between chemo-mechanical signaling and actin diffusion, shedding light on the role of podosomes in immune cell mechanosensing within the context of wound healing and cancer immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
3
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
9
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
16
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
17
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%