Visual Attention in The Fovea and The Periphery during Visual Search
Zhang, J.; Zhu, X.; Wang, S.; Ma, Z.; Esteky, H.; Tian, Y.; Desimone, R.; Zhou, H.
Show abstract
Visual search depends on both the foveal and peripheral visual system, yet the foveal attention mechanisms is still lack of insights. We simultaneously recorded the foveal and peripheral activities in V4, IT and LPFC, while monkeys performed a category-based visual search task. Feature attention enhanced responses of Face-selective, House-selective, and Non-selective foveal cells in visual cortex. While foveal attention effects appeared no matter the peripheral attention effects, paying attention to the foveal stimulus dissipated the peripheral feature attentional effects, and delayed the peripheral spatial attentional effects. When target features appeared both in the foveal and the peripheral, feature attention effects seemed to occur predominately in the foveal, which might not distribute across the visual field according to common view of distributed feature attention effects. As a result, the parallel attentive process seemed to occur during distractor fixations, while the serial process predominated during target fixations in visual search.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex 96%
- Adaptive coding across visual features during free-viewing and fixation conditions 96%
- Efficient value encoding through convergence of tactile and visual value information in the primate putamen 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attention improves information flow between neuronal populations without changing the communication subspace 95%
- Dendritic Architecture Enables de Novo Computation of Salient Motion in the Superior Colliculus 95%
- Excitatory drive to the globus pallidus external segment facilitates action initiation in non-human primates 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.