Back

A Comparison Study between Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typically Control in Graph Frequency Bands Using Graph and Triadic Interaction Metrics

Talesh Jafadideh, A.; Mohammadzadeh Asl, B.

2021-11-20 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.11.19.469268 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many researchers using many different approaches have attempted to find features discriminating between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically control (TC) subjects. In this study, this attempt has been continued by analyzing global metrics of functional graphs and metrics of functional triadic interactions of the brain in the low, middle, and high-frequency bands (LFB, MFB, and HFB) of the structural graph. The graph signal processing (GSP) provided the combinatorial usage of the functional graph of resting-state fMRI and structural graph of DTI. In comparison to TCs, ASDs had significantly higher clustering coefficients in the MFB, higher efficiencies and strengths in the MFB and HFB, and lower small-world propensity in the HFB. These results show over-connectivity, more global integration, and probably decreased local specialization in ASDs compared to TCs. Triadic analysis showed that the numbers of unbalanced triads were significantly lower for ASDs in the MFB. This finding may show the reason for restricted and repetitive behavior in ASDs. Also, in the MFB and HFB, the numbers of balanced triads and the energies of triadic interactions were significantly higher and lower for ASDs, respectively. These findings may reflect the disruption of the optimum balance between functional integration and specialization. All of these results demonstrated that the significant differences between ASDs and TCs existed in the MFB and HFB of the structural graph when analyzing the global metrics of the functional graph and triadic interaction metrics. In conclusion, the results demonstrate the promising perspective of GSP for attaining discriminative features and new knowledge, especially in the case of ASD. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=146 SRC="FIGDIR/small/469268v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@100df67org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4b2455org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13e51d5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6e789c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical Abstract C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.6%
3
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
8
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
26
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%