Algorithmic Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification for Hodgkin-Huxley Neuron Models
Wang, Y. C.; Sinha, N.; Rudi, J.; Velasco, J.; Idumah, G.; Powers, R. K.; Heckman, C. J.; Chardon, M.
Show abstract
Experimental data-based parameter search for Hodgkin-Huxley-style (HH) neuron models is a major challenge for neuroscientists and neuroengineers. Current search strategies are often computationally expensive, are slow to converge, have difficulty handling nonlinearities or multimodalities in the objective function, or require good initial parameter guesses. Most important, many existing approaches lack quantification of uncertainties in parameter estimates even though such uncertainties are of immense biological significance. We propose a novel method for parameter inference and uncertainty quantification in a Bayesian framework using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. This approach incorporates prior knowledge about model parameters (as probability distributions) and aims to map the prior to a posterior distribution of parameters informed by both the model and the data. Furthermore, using the adaptive parallel tempering strategy for MCMC, we tackle the highly nonlinear, noisy, and multimodal loss function, which depends on the HH neuron model. We tested the robustness of our approach using the voltage trace data generated from a 9-parameter HH model using five levels of injected currents (0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 nA). Each test consisted of running the ground truth with its respective currents to estimate the model parameters. To simulate the condition for fitting a frequency-current (F-I) curve, we also introduced an aggregate objective that runs MCMC against all five levels simultaneously. We found that MCMC was able to produce many solutions with acceptable loss values (e.g., for 0.0 nA, 889 solutions were within 0.5% of the best solution and 1,595 solutions within 1% of the best solution). Thus, an adaptive parallel tempering MCMC search provides a "landscape" of the possible parameter sets with acceptable loss values in a tractable manner. Our approach is able to obtain an intelligently sampled global view of the solution distributions within a search range in a single computation. Additionally, the advantage of uncertainty quantification allows for exploration of further solution spaces, which can serve to better inform future experiments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter for Neuronal State and Parameter Estimation 96%
- Axon initial segment plasticity caused by auditory deprivation degrades time difference sensitivity in a model of neural responses to cochlear implants 93%
- Homogeneous inhibition is optimal for the phase precession of place cells in the CA1 field 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards a mesoscale physical modeling framework for stereotactic-EEG recordings 93%
- Three Novel Methods for Determining Motor Threshold with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Outperform Conventional Procedures 93%
- Event Detection and Classification from Multimodal Time Series with Application to Neural Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.