The spotlight of attention turns from rhythmic exploration-exploitation to a stable exploitation state
Melcon, M.; van Bree, S.; Sanchez-Carro, Y.; Barreiro-Fernandez, L.; Kolibius, L. D.; Alzueta, E.; Wimber, M.; Capilla, A.; Hanslmayr, S.
Show abstract
While traditional studies claim that visuospatial attention stays fixed at one location at a time, recent research has rather shown that attention rhythmically fluctuates between different locations at rates of prominent brain rhythms. However, little is known about the temporal dynamics of this fluctuation and, particularly, whether it changes over time. Thus, we addressed this question by investigating how visuospatial attention behaves over space and time. We recorded electroencephalographic activity of twenty-seven human participants while they performed a visuospatial cueing task, where attention was covertly oriented to the left or right visual field. In order to decode the spatial locus of attention from neural activity, we trained and tested a classifier on every timepoint of the orienting period, from the attentional cue to stimulus onset. This resulted in one temporal generalization matrix per participant, which was time-frequency decomposed to identify the sampling rhythm. Finally, a searchlight analysis was conducted to reveal the brain regions responsible for attention allocation. Our results show a dynamic evolution of the attentional spotlight, distinguishing between two states. In an early time window, attention explored both cued and uncued hemifield rhythmically at ~10 Hz. In a later time window attention focused on the cued hemifield. Classification was driven by occipital sources, while frontal regions exclusively became involved just before the spotlight settled onto the cued location. Together, our results define attentional sampling as a quasi-rhythmic dynamic process characterized by an initial rhythmic exploration-exploitation state, which is followed by a stable exploitation state.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Task-related modulation of event-related potentials does not reflect changes to sensory representations 98%
- Oscillatory Multi-Timescale Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Sequence Prediction 98%
- The representational dynamics of the animal appearance bias in human visual cortex are indicative of fast feedforward processing 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct roles of forward and backward alpha-band waves in spatial visual attention 98%
- Event-related modulation of alpha rhythm explains the auditory P300 evoked response in EEG 97%
- Modulation of aperiodic EEG activity provides sensitive index of cognitive state changes during working memory task 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.