Back

Multiple adaptive solutions to face climatic constraints: novel insights in the debate over the role of convergence in local adaptation

Benjelloun, B.; Leempoel, K.; Boyer, F.; Stucki, S.; Streeter, I.; Orozco ter Wengel, P.; Alberto, F. J.; Servin, B.; Biscarini, F.; Alberti, A.; Engelen, S.; Stella, A.; Colli, L.; Coissac, E.; Bruford, M. W.; Ajmone-Marsan, P.; Negrini, R.; Clarke, L.; Flicek, P.; Chikhi, A.; Joost, S.; Taberlet, P.; Pompanon, F.

2021-11-19 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.11.18.469099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The extent to which genomic convergence shapes locally adapted phenotypes in different species remains a fundamental question in evolutionary biology. To bring new insights to this debate we set up a framework which aimed to compare the adaptive trajectories of two domesticated mammal species co-distributed in diversified landscapes. We sequenced the genomes of 160 sheep and 161 goats extensively managed along environmental gradients, including temperature, rainfall, seasonality and altitude, to identify genes and biological processes shaping local adaptation. Allele frequencies at adaptive loci were rarely found to vary gradually along environmental gradients, but rather displayed a discontinuous shift at the extremities of environmental clines. Of the more than 430 adaptive genes identified, only 6 were orthologous between sheep and goats and those responded differently to environmental pressures, suggesting different adaptive mechanisms in these two closely related species. Such diversity of adaptive pathways may result from a high number of biological functions involved in adaptation to multiple eco-climatic gradients, and provides more arguments for the role of contingency and stochasticity in adaptation rather than repeatability.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.