Back

Best BLAST hit alone cannot be used as evidence of fraud

Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N.; Diaz-Arce, N.

2021-11-19 genetics
10.1101/2021.11.16.468182 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In a recent study, Blanco-Fernandez, et al. 1 applied molecular tools to authenticate fish products and conclude evidence of "worrying international fraud". They revealed mislabeling in recognizable and unrecognizable fish products labeled as anchovy, hake and tuna commercialized by European companies. Their analyses consisted on extracting DNA from the fish product to be authenticated followed by amplification and sequencing of a suite of DNA markers and on comparing the resulting sequences to the GenBank sequence database using BLAST (Basic Tool Alignment Search Tool) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). By carefully reanalyzing their data, we identify errors in their species identification and conclude that best BLAST hit alone cannot be used as evidence of fraud.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.