Back

Scaling between DNA and cell size governs bacterial growth homeostasis and resource allocation

Li, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Qiao, X.; Shi, Y.; Li, C.; Ouyang, Q.; Wei, P.; Qian, L.

2021-11-12 systems biology
10.1101/2021.11.12.468234 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacteria maintain a stable cell size and a certain DNA content through proliferation as described by classic growth laws. How cells behave when this inherent scaling is broken, however, has rarely been interrogated. Here we engineered Escherichia coli cells with extremely low DNA contents using a tunable synthetic tool CRISPRori that temporarily inhibited chromosome replication initiation. A detailed mechanistic model coupling DNA replication, cell growth, and division revealed a fundamental DNA-centric growth law, which was validated by two observations. First, lineage dynamics were robust to large CRISPRori perturbations with division cycles rapidly restoring through a timer mechanism rather than the adder rule. Second, cellular growth transitioned into a linear regime at low DNA-cytoplasm ratios. Experiments and theory showed that in this regime, cellular resource was redirected to plasmid-borne gene expression. Together with the ability of CRISPRori to bi-directionally modulate plasmid copy numbers, these findings suggest a novel strategy for bio-production enhancement.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
47.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
7
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.0%
8
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
9
Nature Microbiology
○ 155 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
13
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Nature Genetics
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Nature Physics
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.