The abiotic and biotic environment together predict plant, mammal, and bird diversity and turnover across the United States
Gallinat, A. S.; Pearse, W. D.
Show abstract
The distribution of taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional biodiversity results from a combination of abiotic and biotic drivers which are scale dependent. Parsing the relative influence of these drivers is critical to understanding the processes underlying species assembly and generating predictions of biodiversity across taxonomic groups and for novel sites. However, doing so requires data that capture a spatial extent large enough to reflect broad-scale dynamics such as speciation and biogeography, and a spatial grain fine enough to detect local-scale dynamics like environmental filtering and biotic interactions. We used species inventories of vascular plants, birds, and mammals collected by the U.S. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) at 38 terrestrial field sites, to explore the processes underlying taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity and turnover. We found that, for both species richness (alpha-diversity) and turnover (beta-diversity), taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity are weak proxies for one-another, and thus may capture different species assembly processes. All diversity metrics were best predicted by a combination of abiotic and biotic variables. Taxonomic and phylogenetic richness tended to be higher at warmer, wetter sites, reflecting the role energy inputs play in driving broad-scale diversity. However, plant diversity was negatively correlated with bird phylogenetic and mammal functional diversity, implying trait conservation in plant communities may limit niche availability for consumer species. Equally, turnover in bird and mammal species across sites were associated with plant turnover. That the biodiversity of one taxon is predictive of another across these North American sites, even when controlling for environment, supports a role for the cross-clade biotic environment in driving species assembly.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Jack-of-all-trades paradigm meets long-term data: generalist herbivores are more widespread and locally less abundant 95%
- Global plant-frugivore trait matching is shaped by climate and biogeographic history 95%
- Legacy of the lost and pressure of the present: Malagasy plant seeds retain megafauna dispersal signatures but downsize under human footprint 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Local biodiversity change reflects interactions among changing abundance, evenness and richness 96%
- Diversity-stability relationships become decoupled across spatial scales: a synthesis of organism and ecosystem types 94%
- Sampling bias and the robustness of ecological metrics for plant-damage-type association networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Universality in biodiversity patterns: Variation in species-temperature and species-productivity relationships reveals a prominent role of productivity in diversity gradients 94%
- Trait-similarity and trait-hierarchy jointly determine co-occurrences of resident and invasive ant species 93%
- Predicting predator-prey interactions in terrestrial endotherms using random forest 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The roles of isolation and interspecific interaction in generating the functional diversity of an insular mammal radiation 95%
- Fractal triads efficiently sample ecological diversity and processes across spatial scales 95%
- Simple attributes predict the importance of plants as hosts to the richness of fungi and arthropods 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.