Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and severity of COVID-19 in people with HIV infection
DelAmo, J.; Polo, R.; Moreno, S.; Martinez, E.; Cabello, A.; Iribarren, J. A.; Curran, A.; Macias, J.; Montero, M.; Duenas, C.; Marino, A. I.; Perez de la Camara, S.; Diaz, A.; Arribas, J. R.; Jarrin, I.; Hernan, M. A.; The CoVIHd Collaboration in Spain,
Show abstract
BackgroundEffective, safe, and affordable antivirals are needed for COVID-19. Tenofovir has not been studied in randomized trials despite evidence consistent with its effectiveness against COVID-19. MethodsWe studied HIV-positive individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 2020 at 69 HIV clinics in Spain. We collected data on sociodemographics, ART, CD4-cell count, HIV-RNA viral load, comorbidities and the following outcomes: laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. We compared the 48-week risks for individuals receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/ FTC, abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC), and other regimes. All estimates were adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics via inverse probability weighting. ResultsOf 51,558 eligible individuals, 39.6% were on TAF/FTC, 11.9% on TDF/FTC, 26.6% on ABC/3TC, 21.8% on other regimes. There were 2,402 documented SARS-CoV-2 infections (425 hospitalizations, 45 ICU admissions, 37 deaths). Compared with TAF/FTC, the estimated risk ratios (RR) (95% CI) of hospitalization were 0.66 (0.43, 0.91) for TDF/FTC and 1.29 (1.02, 1.58) for ABC/3TC, the RRs of ICU admission were 0.28 (0.11, 0.90) for TDF/FTC and 1.39 (0.70, 2.80) for ABC/3TC, and the RRs of death were 0.37 (0.23, 1.90) for TDF/FTC and 2.02 (0.88-6.12) for ABC/3TC. The corresponding RRs of hospitalization for TDF/FTC were 0.49 (0.24, 0.81) in individuals [≥]50 years and 1.15 (0.59, 1.93) in younger individuals. ConclusionOur findings suggest that, compared with other antiretrovirals, TDF/FTC lowers COVID-19 severity among HIV-positive individuals with virological control. This protective effect may be restricted to individuals aged 50 years and older.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Trends And Transmission Dynamics Of Pre-Treatment HIV-1 Drug Resistance Within And Between Risk Groups In Kenya, 1986-2020 93%
- Notable transmitted HIV drug resistance among people who inject drugs in Pakistan 91%
- Estimating the cost of antibiotic use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 96%
- Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with dolutegravir versus efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy: emulated target trials using routine, de-identified data from South Africa 94%
- Patterns of HIV-1 viral load suppression and drug resistance during the dolutegravir transition: a population-based longitudinal study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes for people living with HIV: a rapid review and meta-analysis 95%
- Urine tenofovir and dried blood spot tenofovir diphosphate concentrations and viraemia in people taking efavirenz and dolutegravir based antiretroviral therapy 93%
- Use of undetectable viral load to improve survey estimates of known HIV-positive status and antiretroviral treatment coverage 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of Clinical Outcomes among People with HIV and Tuberculosis Symptoms after Rapid Treatment Initiation in Haiti 94%
- Clinical outcomes after viraemia among people receiving dolutegravir versus efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy in South Africa 94%
- Risk of Post-COVID Conditions among adolescents and adults who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for acute COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.