Back

Feasibility Of Vascular Remodeling Parameter Estimation For Assessing Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorders

Kissas, G.; Hwuang, E.; Thompson, E.; Schwartz, N.; Detre, J.; Witschey, W.; Perdikaris, P.

2021-11-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.11.10.468132 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hypertensive pregnancy disorders, such as preeclampsia, are leading sources of both maternal and fetal morbidity in pregnancy. Non-invasive imaging, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is an important tool in predicting and monitoring these high risk pregnancies. While imaging can measure hemodynamic parameters, such as uterine artery pulsatility and resistivity indices, the interpretation of such metrics for disease assessment rely on ad-hoc standards, which provide limited insight to the physical mechanisms underlying the emergence of hypertensive pregnancy disorders. To provide meaningful interpretation of measured hemodynamic data in patients, advances in computational fluid dynamics can be brought to bear. In this work, we develop a patient-specific computational framework that combines Bayesian inference with a reduced-order fluid dynamics model to infer remodeling parameters, such as vascular resistance, compliance and vessel cross-sectional area, known to be related to the development of hypertension. The proposed framework enables the prediction of hemodynamic quantities of interest, such as pressure and velocity, directly from sparse and noisy MRI measurements. We illustrate the effectiveness of this approach in two systemic arterial network geometries: an aorta with carotid and a maternal pelvic arterial network. For both cases, the model can reconstruct the provided measurements and infer parameters of interest. In the case of the maternal pelvic arteries, the model can make a distinction between the pregnancies destined to develop hypertension and those that remain normotensive, expressed through the value range of the predicted absolute pressure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.5%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
4
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
11
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%