Back

Biological integrity enhances the qualitative effectiveness of conditional mice-oak mutualisms

Diaz, M.; Moran-Lopez, T.; Sanchez-Davila, J.; Torre, I.; Navarro-Castilla, A.; Barja, I.

2021-11-10 ecology
10.1101/2021.11.10.468095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scatter-hoarding decisions by rodents are key for the long-term maintenance of scattered tree populations. Decisions are determined by seed value, competition and predation risk, so that they can be influenced by the integrity of the biological system composed by trees, rodents, ungulate competitors, and rodent predators. We manipulate and model the oak-mice interaction in a Spanish dehesa, an anthropogenic savanna system suffering chronic tree regeneration failure, and quantify the joint effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on acorn dispersal effectiveness. First, we conducted a large-scale cafeteria field experiment, where we modified ungulate presence and predation risk, and followed mouse scatter-hoarding decisions under contrasting levels of moonlight and acorn availability. Then, we estimated the net effects of competition and risk by means of transition probability models that simulated mouse scatter-hoarding decisions according to the environmental context. Our results show that suboptimal conditions for mice balance the interaction towards the mutualism as they force mice to forage less efficiently. Under stressful conditions (predation risks and presence of ungulates), lack of antipredatory cover around dehesa trees limited transportation of acorns, but also precluded mice activities outside tree canopies. As a result, post-dispersal predation rates were reduced and large acorns had a higher probability to survive. Our work shows that inter-specific interactions preventing efficient foraging by scatter-hoarders benefitted seed dispersal. Therefore, the maintenance of the full set of producers, consumers, dispersers and predators in ecosystems is key for promoting seed dispersal effectiveness in conditional mutualisms.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
4
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
6
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
14
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
19
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
20
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
25
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%