Back

The bacterial actin-like cell division protein FtsA forms curved antiparallel double filaments upon binding of FtsN

Nierhaus, T.; McLaughlin, S. H.; Bürmann, F.; Kureisaite-Ciziene, D.; Maslen, S.; Skehel, M. J.; Yu, C. W.; Freund, S. M.; Funke, L. F.; Chin, J. W.; Löwe, J.

2021-11-08 microbiology
10.1101/2021.11.08.467742 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell growth and division of walled bacteria depend on the synthesis and remodelling of peptidoglycan (PG). These activities are carried out by two multiprotein complexes, the elongasome and the divisome during cell elongation and division, respectively. Filaments of tubulin-like FtsZ form the cytoplasmic scaffold for divisome assembly, the Z-ring. In E. coli, the actin homologue FtsA anchors the Z-ring to the membrane and recruits downstream divisome components, including bitopic FtsN. FtsN is recruited late and activates the periplasmic PG synthase FtsWI. To start unravelling the activation mechanism involving FtsA and FtsN, we showed that E. coli FtsA forms antiparallel double filaments on lipid monolayers when also binding FtsNs cytoplasmic tail, and that Vibrio maritimus FtsA crystallised as an equivalent double filament. We structurally located the FtsA-FtsN interaction site in FtsAs IA-IC interdomain cleft and confirmed FtsA double filament formation in vivo using site-specific cysteine cross-linking. FtsA-FtsN double filaments reconstituted on and in liposomes preferred negative Gaussian curvature, as was previously shown for the elongasomes actin, MreB. MreB filaments serve as curvature-sensing "rudders", orienting insertion of PG around the cells circumference. We propose that curved antiparallel FtsA double filaments function similarly in the divisome: FtsA filaments, together with dynamic FtsZ filaments orient and concentrate cell-constricting septal PG synthesis in the division plane.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.