Evaluating Digital Device Technology in Alzheimer's Disease via Artificial Intelligence
Sood, M.; Aborageh, M.; Domingo-Fernandez, D.; Harms, R.; Lordick, T.; Birkenbihl, C.; Owens, A. P.; Coello, N.; Narayan, V. A.; Buegler, M.; Froehlich, H.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, ; RADAR-AD Consortium,
Show abstract
The use of digital technologies may help to diagnose Alzheimers Disease (AD) at the pre-symptomatic stage. However, before implementation into clinical practice, digital measures (DMs) need to be evaluated for their diagnostic benefit compared to established questionnaire-based assessments, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for cognition and Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ) for daily functioning. Moreover, the quantitative and qualitative relationship of DMs to these well understood scores needs to be clarified to aid interpretation. In this work we analyzed data from 148 subjects, 58 cognitively normal and 90 at different stages of the disease, which had performed a smartphone based virtual reality game to assess cognitive function. In addition, we used clinical data from Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We employed an Artificial Intelligence (AI) based approach to elucidate the relationship of DMs to questionnaire-based cognition and functional activity scores. In addition, we used Machine Learning (ML) and statistical methods to assess the diagnostic benefit of DMs compared to questionnaire-based scores. We found non-trivial relationships between DMs, MMSE, and FAQ which can be visualized as a complex network. DMs, in particular those reflecting scores of individual tasks in the virtual reality game, showed a better ability to discriminate between different stages of the disease than questionnaire-based methods. Our results indicate that DMs have the potential to act as a crucial measure in the early diagnosis and staging of AD.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable deep learning approach for extracting cognitive features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons in older adults 97%
- A scoping review of remote and unsupervised digital cognitive assessments in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease 95%
- A Remote Digital Memory Composite to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Memory Clinic Samples in Unsupervised Settings using Mobile Devices 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison and aggregation of event sequences across ten cohorts to describe the consensus biomarker evolution in Alzheimer’s disease 95%
- An explainable self-attention deep neural network for detecting mild cognitive impairment using multi-inputbdigital drawing tasks 95%
- ADataViewer: Exploring Semantically Harmonized Alzheimer’s Disease Cohort Datasets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting cognitive decline in a low-dimensional representation of brain morphology 96%
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Brain Connectivity Changes for Alzheimer's Disease 94%
- Longitudinal functional connectivity during rest and task is differentially related to Alzheimer's pathology and episodic memory in older adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of clinical validity of publicly available software packages 95%
- Enhancing Early Detection of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly through Ensemble of NLP Techniques: A Comparative Study Utilizing Large Language Models in Clinical Notes 93%
- The ratio of plasma pTau181 and pTau217 to Aβ42 outperforms individual measurements in detecting brain amyloidosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a speech-based AI system for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease remotely via smartphones 96%
- Relationship of plasma biomarkers to digital cognitive tests in alzheimer's disease 95%
- Investigating the Amyloid-Tau-Neurodegeneration Framework in Alzheimer's Disease Using Semi-Supervised Multimodal Imaging Data Fusion 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.