Back

De novo assembly of 20 chickens reveals the undetectable phenomenon for thousands of core genes on sub-telomeric regions

Li, M.; Sun, C.; Xu, N.; Bian, P.; Tian, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Jia, X.; Heller, R.; Wang, M.; Wang, F.; Dai, X.; Luo, R.; Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, P.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Wen, C.; Lan, F.; SIDDIKI, A. Z.; Suwannapoom, C.; Zhao, X.; Nie, Q.; Hu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, N.

2021-11-05 genomics
10.1101/2021.11.05.467060 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The gene numbers and evolutionary rates of birds were assumed to be much lower than that of mammals, which in sharp contrast to the huge species number and morphological diversity of birds. It is very necessary to construct a complete avian genome and analyze its evolution.We constructed a chicken pan-genome from 20 de novo genome assemblies with high sequencing depth, newly identified 1,335 protein-coding genes and 3,011 long noncoding RNAs. The majority of these novel genes were detected across most individuals of the examined transcriptomes but were accidentally measured in each of the DNA sequencing data regardless of Illumina or PacBio technology. Furthermore, different from previous pan-genome models, most of these novel genes were overrepresented on chromosomal sub-telomeric regions, surrounded with extremely high proportions of tandem repeats, and strongly blocked DNA sequencing. These hidden genes were proved to be shared by all chicken genomes, included many housekeeping genes, and enriched in immune pathways. Comparative genomics revealed the novel genes had three-fold elevated substitution rates than known ones, updating the evolutionary rates of birds. Our study provides a framework for constructing a better chicken genome, which will contribute towards the understanding of avian evolution and improvement of poultry breeding.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.