Back

Prediction of broad chemical toxicities using induced pluripotent stem cells and gene networks by transfer learning from embryonic stem cell data

Yamane, J.; Wada, T.; Otsuki, H.; Inomata, K.; Suzuki, M.; Hisaki, T.; Sekine, S.; Kouzuki, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Sone, H.; Yamashita, J. K.; Osawa, M.; Saito, M. K.; Fujibuchi, W.

2021-11-05 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2021.11.05.466718 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The assessment of toxic chemicals using animals has limited applicability to humans. Moreover, from the perspective of animal protection, effective alternatives are also desired. Previously, we developed a method that combines developmental toxicity testing based on undifferentiated human embryonic stem (ES) cells (KhES-3) and gene networks. We showed that [≥] 95% accurate predictions could be achieved for neurotoxins, genotoxic carcinogens, and non-genotoxic carcinogens. Here, we expanded this method to predict broad toxicities and predicted the toxicity of 24 chemicals in six categories (neurotoxins, cardiotoxins, hepatotoxins, nephrotoxins [glomerular nephrotoxins/tubular nephrotoxins], and non-genotoxic carcinogens) and achieved high prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.90-1.00) in all categories. Moreover, to develop a testing system with fewer ethical issues, we screened for an induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell line on the basis of cytotoxic sensitivity and used this line to predict toxicity in the six categories based on the gene networks of iPS cells using transfer learning from the ES cell gene networks. We successfully predicted toxicities in four toxin categories (neurotoxins, hepatotoxins, glomerular nephrotoxins, and non-genotoxic carcinogens) at high accuracy (AUC = 0.82-0.99). These results demonstrate that the prediction of chemical toxicity is possible even with iPS cells by transfer learning once a gene expression database has been developed from an ES cell line. This method holds promise for tailor-made safety evaluations using individual iPS cells.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.