miR-409-3p represses Cited2 at the evolutionary emergence of the callosal and corticospinal projections
Wagner, N. R.; Sinha, A.; Siththanandan, V. B.; Kowalchuk, A. N.; MacDonald, J.; Tharin, S.
Show abstract
Callosal projection neurons are a broad population of interhemispheric projection neurons that extend an axon across the corpus callosum to connect the two cerebral hemispheres. The corticospinal tract, comprised of the axons of corticospinal projection neurons, is unique to mammals, and its full extension to the lumbar segments that control walking is, like the corpus callosum, unique to placental mammals. The emergence of these two distinct axonal tracts is thought to underpin the evolutionary expansion of complex motor and cognitive abilities. The molecular mechanisms regulating the divergence of corticospinal and callosal projection neurons are incompletely understood. Our recent work identifies a genomic cluster of microRNAs (12qF1/Mirg) unique to placental mammals. These clustered miRNAs are specifically expressed by corticospinal vs. callosal projection neurons during the molecular refinement of corticospinal vs. callosal projection neuron fate (1). One of these, miR-409-3p, can convert layer V callosal into corticospinal projection neurons, acting in part through repression of the callosal-expressed transcriptional regulator Lmo4. This conversion is partial, however, suggesting that miR-409-3p represses multiple callosal projection neuron control genes in order to specify corticospinal projection neurons. One potential additional target of miR-409-3p repression is the callosal-expressed transcriptional co-activator Cited2. Cited2 interacts genetically with Lmo4, and Lmo4 can partially functionally compensate for Cited2 in thymus development(2). Further, Cited2 and Lmo4 function as opposing molecular controls over specific areal identity within superficial layer callosal projection neurons of the somatosensory and motor cortices, respectively (3). Cited2 is highly expressed by callosal, relative to corticospinal, projection neurons from the earliest stages of neurogenesis. Cited2 is necessary for the expansion of intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs) in the subventricular zone (SVZ), and the resulting generation of superficial layer callosal projection neurons. Here we show that miR-409-3p and Cited2 interact in IPCs and in corticospinal vs. deep layer callosal projection neuron development. miR-409-3p represses the Cited2 3UTR in luciferase assays. Mirg, which encodes miR-409-3p, and Cited2, are reciprocally expressed in IPCs at e15.5 by qPCR. Furthermore, miR-409-3p gain-of-function results in a phenocopy of established Cited2 loss-of-function in IPCs. Later on, miR-409-3p and Cited2 exert opposing effects on the adoption of corticospinal vs. callosal projection neuron subtype identity. Taken together, our work suggests that miR-409-3p, and possibly other 12qF1 miRNAs, represses Cited2 in IPCs to limit their proliferation, and in developing corticospinal and deep layer callosal projection neurons to favor corticospinal fate.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterozygosity for neurodevelopmental disorder-associated TRIO variants yields distinct deficits in behavior, neuronal development, and synaptic transmission in mice. 94%
- Transcriptional regulation of neural stem cell expansion in adult hippocampus 94%
- Dual role of FOXG1 in regulating gliogenesis in the developing neocortex via the FGF signalling pathway. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ire1α-Regulated mRNA Translation Rate Controls the Identity and Polarity of Upper Layer Cortical Neurons 95%
- Endonucleosis mediates internalization of cytoplasm into the nucleus in senescent cells 94%
- DNA replication in early mammalian embryos is patterned, predisposing lamina-associated regions to fragility 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.