Back

The Constitutive Activity Of The Histamine H1 Receptor Interaction With The Nmda Receptor Consequences: In Epilepsy

josset, n.; ARRANG, J. M.; armand, v.

2021-11-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.11.02.466417 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study attempted to clarify the role of histamine H1 receptors in epilepsy by exploring the effects of agonists and inverse agonists on the rundown of the current induced by iterative applications of NMDA or GABA. Mepyramine, a classical H1-receptor antagonist / inverse agonist, increased the NMDA current by about 40 % during the first minutes of recording. This effect was concentration-dependent, maximal at 10 nM, and mimicked by triprolidine, another antagonist / inverse agonist. No endogenous histamine being detected in the cultures by a selective immunoassay, both compounds were acting as inverse agonists. Indicating a high constitutive activity of the H1 receptor in this system, histamine did not affect on the NMDA rundown, including its settlement, but reversed significantly the effect of mepyramine. A similar pattern was obtained with 2,3 bromophenyl histamine, a selective H1-receptor agonist. The initial increase induced by the two inverse agonists was followed by the same rundown as in controls. H1- and NMDA receptors colocalised in most cultured neuronal cells. Mepyramine and histamine did not affect on the GABA rundown. Our findings suggest an interaction between H1- and NMDA receptors. Inactivation of the H1-receptor by its inverse agonists delays the settlement of the NMDA rundown, which may underlie their proconvulsant effect reported in clinics. Therefore, H1-receptor constitutive activity, and the effect of histamine revealed in its absence, tend to facilitate the initiation of the rundown, which is consistent with the anticonvulsant properties of histamine via activation of H1-receptors reported in many studies.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.