Back

Powerful synergistic effects of a STING agonist and an IL-2 superkine in cancer immunotherapy against MHC I-deficient and MHC I+ tumors

Wolf, N. K.; Blaj, C.; Picton, L.; Snyder, G.; Zhang, L.; Nicolai, C. J.; Ndubaku, C. O.; McWhirter, S. M.; Garcia, K. C.; Raulet, D. H.

2021-11-02 immunology
10.1101/2021.11.02.465022 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) and TLR ligands mobilize antitumor responses by NK cells and T cells, potentially serving as complementary therapies to immune checkpoint therapy. In the clinic thus far, however, CDN therapy has yielded mixed results, perhaps because it initiates responses potently, but does not provide signals to sustain activation and proliferation of activated cytotoxic lymphocytes. To improve efficacy, we combined CDNs with a half-life extended IL-2 superkine, H9-MSA. CDN/H9-MSA therapy induced dramatic long-term remissions of the most difficult-to-treat MHC I-deficient and MHC I+ tumor transplant models. H9-MSA combined with CpG oligonucleotide also induced potent responses. Mechanistically, tumor elimination required CD8 T cells and not NK cells in the case of MHC I+ tumors and NK cells but not CD8 T cells in the case of MHC-deficient tumors. Furthermore, combination therapy resulted in more prolonged and more intense NK cell activation, cytotoxicity and expression of cytotoxic effector molecules in comparison to monotherapy. Remarkably, in a primary autochthonous sarcoma model that is refractory to PD-1 checkpoint therapy, the combination of CDN/H9-MSA combined with checkpoint therapy yielded long-term remissions in the majority of animals, mediated by T cells and NK cells. This novel combination therapy has potential to activate responses in tumors resistant to current therapies and prevent MHC I-loss accompanying acquired resistance of tumors to checkpoint therapy. One sentence summaryPowerful immunotherapy effects mediated by the combination of innate agonists and superkine.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.