Low selectivity index of ivermectin and macrocyclic lactones on SARS-CoV2 replication in vitro argues against their therapeutic use for COVID-19.
Chable-Bessia, C.; Boulle, C.; Neyret, A.; Swain, J. M.; Henaut, M.; Merida, P.; Gros, N.; Makinson, A.; Lyonnais, S.; Chesnais, C. B.; Muriaux, D.
Show abstract
There are very limited antiviral therapeutic options for coronavirus infections, therefore global drug re-purposing efforts are paramount to identify available compounds that could provide clinical benefits to patients with COVID-19. Ivermectin was first approved for human use as an endectocide in the 1980s. It remains one of the most important global health medicines in history and has recently been shown to exert in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. However, the macrocyclic lactone family of compounds has not previously been evaluated for activity against SARS-CoV-2. The present study aims at comparing their anti-viral activity in relevant pulmonary cell lines in vitro. Here, in vitro antiviral activity of the avermectins (ivermectin and selamectin) and milbemycins (moxidectin and milbemycin oxime) were assessed against a clinical isolate from a CHU Montpellier patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020. Ivermectin demonstrated anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro in human pulmonary cells in comparison to VeroE6 (with EC50 of 1-3 M). Similarly, the other macrocyclic lactones moxidectin, milbemycin oxime and selamectin reduced SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro (with EC50 of 2-5 M). Immunofluorescence assays with ivermectin and moxidectin showed a reduction in the number of infected and polynuclear cells suggesting a drug action on viral cell fusion. However, cellular toxicity of the avermectins and milbemycins during infection showed a very low selectivity index <10 for all compounds. In conclusion, none of these agents appears suitable for human use for its anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity per se, due to low selectivity index. This is discussed in regards to recent clinical COVID studies on ivermectin.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-antiviral effects of a PIKfyve inhibitor on respiratory virus infection in human nasal epithelium and mice 96%
- Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors Show Differential Efficacy and Interactions with Remdesivir for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in Vitro 96%
- Atazanavir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication and pro-inflammatory cytokine production 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of novel Ebola virus inhibitors using biologically contained virus 97%
- Remdesivir, Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir remain active against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and other variants of concern. 96%
- Combined in silico docking and in vitro antiviral testing for drug repurposing identified lurasidone and elbasvir as SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-OC43 inhibitors 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Petasites hybridus CO2-extract (Ze 339) blocks SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro 98%
- Active components of commonly prescribed medicines affect influenza A virus-host cell interaction: a pilot study 96%
- ZRC3308 monoclonal antibody cocktail shows protective efficacy in Syrian hamsters against SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metal Coordinating Inhibitors of Rift Valley Fever virus Replication 97%
- High-throughput phenotypic screen identifies a new family of potent anti-amoebic compounds 94%
- The wide spectrum anti-inflammatory activity of andrographolide in comparison to NSAIDs: a promising therapeutic compound against the cytokine storm 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atazanavir is a competitive inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, impairing variants replication in vitro and in vivo 98%
- Methylene Blue Is a Nonspecific Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitor with Potential for Repurposing as an Antiviral for COVID-19 97%
- Host-directed FDA-approved drugs with antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 identified by hierarchical in silico/in vitro screening methods 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.