Back

Reproducible Discovery of Cell-Binding Peptides "Lost" in Bulk Amplification via Emulsion Amplification in Phage Display Panning

Matochko, W. L.; Deiss, F.; Yang, Y.; Derda, R.

2021-11-03 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.10.31.466683 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many pharmaceutically-relevant cell surface receptors are functional only in the context of intact cells. Phage display, while being a powerful method for the discovery of ligands for purified proteins often fails to identify a diverse set of ligands to receptors on a cell membrane mosaic. To understand this deficiency, we examined growth bias in naive phage display libraries and observed that it fundamentally changes selection outcomes: The presence of growth-biased (parasite) phage clones in a phage library is detrimental to selection and cell-based panning of such biased libraries is poised to yield ligands from within a small parasite population. Importantly, amplification of phage libraries in water-oil emulsions suppressed the amplification of parasites and steered the selection of biased phage libraries away from parasite population. Attenuation of the growth bias through the use of emulsion amplification reproducibly discovers the ligands for cell-surface receptors that cannot be identified in screen that use conventional bulk amplification. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=161 SRC="FIGDIR/small/466683v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ed14c5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1eec8deorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c5741forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4aa542_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Find Ligands in Droplets Canonical phage display selection of ligands for breast cancer cells, which uses bulk amplification (BA) of phage library, reproducibly identified peptide ligands from a ~0.0001% sub-population of the library, which harbors fast-growing phage. Replacing BA by emulsion-amplification (EmA) altered the selection landscape and yielded cell-binding ligands not accessible to conventional phage-display select C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.