Polycomb Repressive Complexes occupancy reveals PRC2-independent PRC1 critical role in the control of limb development
Gentile, C.; Guerard-Millet, F.; Paul, R.; Mayran, A.; Kmita, M.
Show abstract
The Polycomb Repressive Complexes (PRC) are key players in the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression through their ability to epigenetically silence developmental genes. They are subdivided into two multicomponent complexes, PRC1 and PRC2, functioning through post-translational modifications of histone tails. A large body of work revealed functional interactions between PRC1 and PRC2, whereby trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3) by PRC2 contributes to the recruitment of canonical PRC1 (cPRC1). In parallel, a PRC2-independent binding of PRC1 has been uncovered and referred to as non-canonical PRC1 or variant PRC1 (vPRC1), in which PRC1-dependent ubiquitination of lysine 119 on histone H2A is involved in recruiting PRC2/propagating PRC2-dependent H3K27 trimethylation. While it was initially assumed that cPRC1 and vPRC1 bind distinct targets, subsequent evidence pointed to cPRC1 and vPRC1 sharing a significant subset of targets. How the functional interplay between PRC2, cPRC1 and vPRC1 contributes to gene regulation remains partially understood. Here, we show that, in the developing limb, PRC2 inactivation barely affects PRC1 occupancy, as the majority of PRC2- bound loci are bound by vPRC1 (RYBP-PRC1), both in wild type and PRC2 mutant limbs. Consistent with this, we found that loci bound by CBX2, a PRC1 subunit involved in the recognition of H3K27me3 and thereby recruitment of cPRC1, are, for the vast majority, also bound by vPRC1. Intriguingly, analysis of PRC2 mutant limbs revealed that while a large part of CBX2 occupancy is lost in absence of PRC2 function, as expected from the absence of H3K27me3, there is a significant number of genes retaining CBX2 occupancy as well as a few genes with apparent gain of CBX2 binding. Importantly, among these genes, 56 of them correspond to developmental genes known for playing a key role in limb morphogenesis. Based on the importance of vPRC1 in gene silencing, our findings emphasize the primary role of PRC2-independent PCR1 function in regulating developmental genes and questions the role of PRC2/cPRC1 in controlling developmental programs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SMAD4 target genes are part of a transcriptional network that integrates the response to BMP and SHH signaling during early limb bud patterning 97%
- WNT signaling coordinately controls mouse limb bud outgrowth and establishment of the digit-interdigit pattern 96%
- Hox binding specificity is directed by DNA sequence preferences and differential abilities to engage inaccessible chromatin. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gli3 utilizes Hand2 to synergistically regulate tissue-specific transcriptional networks 96%
- Canonical Wnt Signaling and the Regulation of Divergent Mesenchymal Fgf8 expression in Axolotl Limb Development and Regeneration 96%
- PRC1 Sustains the Memory of Neuronal Fate Independent of PRC2 Function 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mesomelic Dysplasias Associated With The Hoxd Locus Are Caused By Regulatory Reallocations 97%
- Liebenberg syndrome severity arises from variations in Pitx1 locus topology and ectopically transcribing cells 96%
- A spatio-temporally constrained gene regulatory network directed by PBX1/2 acquires limb patterning specificity via HAND2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- En1 and Lmx1b do not recapitulate embryonic dorsal-ventral limb patterning functions during mouse digit tip regeneration 95%
- The Hox transcription factor Ubx ensures somatic myogenesis by suppressing the mesodermal master regulator Twist 94%
- Establishment of 3D chromatin structure after fertilization and the metabolic switch at the morula-to-blastocyst transition require CTCF 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.