Back

Single-molecule imaging suggests compact and spliceosome dependent organization of long introns

Adivarahan, S.; Abeykoon, A. M. S. K.; Zenklusen, D.

2021-10-28 cell biology
10.1101/2021.10.27.466141 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intron removal from pre-mRNAs is a critical step in the processing of RNA polymerase II transcripts, required to create translation competent mRNAs. In humans, introns account for large portions of the pre-mRNA, with intronic sequences representing about 95% of most pre-mRNA. Intron length varies considerably; introns can be as short as a few to hundreds of thousands of nucleotides in length. How nascent long intronic RNA is organized during transcription to facilitate the communication between 5 and 3 splice-sites required for spliceosome assembly however is still poorly understood. Here, we use single-molecule fluorescent RNA in situ hybridization (smFISH) to investigate the spatial organization of co- and post-transcriptional long introns in cells. Using two long introns within the POLA1 pre-mRNA as a model, we show that introns are packaged into compact assemblies, and when fully transcribed, are organized in a looped conformation with their ends in proximity. This organization is observed for nascent and nucleoplasmic pre-mRNAs and requires spliceosome assembly, as disruption of U2 snRNP binding results in introns with separated 5 and 3 ends. Moreover, interrogating the spatial organization of partially transcribed co-transcriptional POLA1 intron 35 indicates that the 5 splice site is maintained proximal to the 3 splice site during transcription, supporting a model that 5 splice site tethering to the elongating polymerase might contribute to spliceosome assembly at long introns. Together, our study reveals details of intron and pre-mRNA organization in cells and provides a tool to investigate mechanisms of splicing for long introns.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.