Long-term effects of network-based fMRI neurofeedback training for sustained attention
Pamplona, G. S. P.; Heldner, J.; Langner, R.; Koush, Y.; Michels, L.; Ionta, S.; Garrido Salmon, C. E.; Scharnowski, F.
Show abstract
Neurofeedback allows for learning voluntary control over ones own brain activity, aiming to enhance cognition and clinical symptoms. A recent study improved sustained attention temporarily by training healthy participants to up-regulate the differential activity of the sustained attention network (SAN) minus the default mode network (DMN). However, long-term learning effects of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback training remain under-explored. Here, we evaluate the effects of network-based fMRI neurofeedback training for sustained attention by assessing behavioral and brain measures before, one day after, and two months after training. The behavioral measures include task as well as questionnaire scores, and the brain measures include activity and connectivity during self-regulation runs without feedback (i.e., transfer runs) and during resting-state runs. Neurally, we found that participants maintained their ability to control the differential activity during follow-up sessions. Further, exploratory analyses showed that the training-induced increase in FC between the DMN and occipital gyrus was maintained during follow-up transfer runs, but not during follow-up resting-state runs. Behaviorally, we found that enhanced sustained attention right after training returned to baseline level during follow-up. The discrepancy between lasting regulation-related brain changes but transient behavioral and resting-state effects raises the question of how neural changes induced by neurofeedback training translate to potential behavioral improvements. Since neurofeedback directly targets brain measures to indirectly improve behavior long-term, a better understanding of the brain-behavior associations during and after neurofeedback training is needed to develop its full potential as a promising scientific and clinical tool. Key pointsO_LIParticipants were still able to self-regulate the differential activity between large-scale networks two months after the end of neurofeedback training and this during transfer runs without feedback. C_LIO_LILasting brain changes were also observed in the functional connectivity of trained regions in runs during which participants engaged in active self-regulation as well as during resting-state runs without concomitant self-regulation. C_LIO_LIThe increased sustained attention we observed right after the end of neurofeedback training did not persist two months later. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal and striatal responses during motor learning are modulated byprefrontal cortex stimulation 97%
- Serotonergic psychedelic drugs LSD and psilocybin reduce the hierarchical differentiation of unimodal and transmodal cortex 96%
- Overlapping attentional networks yield divergent behavioral predictions across tasks: Neuromarkers for diffuse and focused attention? 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Mechanisms of Feedback Processing and Regulation Recalibration during Neurofeedback Training 99%
- Putamen volume predicts real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success across paradigms and neurofeedback target regions 98%
- Network and State Specificity in Connectivity-Based Predictions of Individual Behavior 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.