Back

Cancer/Testis genes are predictive of breast tumor subtypes

Laisne, M.; Benlarama, S.; Nicolas, A.; Djerroudi, L.; Gupta, N.; Daher, D.; Ferry, L.; Kirsh, O.; Philippe, C.; Okada, Y.; Cristofari, G.; Meseure, D.; Vincent-Salomon, A.; Ginestier, C.; Defossez, P.-A.

2021-10-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.10.27.465656 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer in women worldwide. Within breast tumors, the basal-like subtype has the worst prognosis and no dedicated therapy, therefore new tools to understand, detect, and treat these tumors are needed. Certain germline genes are re-expressed in tumors, and constitute the Cancer/Testis genes; their misexpression has diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Here, we designed a new approach to examine Cancer/ Testis gene misexpression in breast tumors. We identify several new markers in Luminal and HER-2 positive tumors, some of which predict response to chemotherapy. We then use machine learning to identify the 2 Cancer/Testis genes most associated with basal-like breast tumors: HORMAD1 and CT83. We show that these genes are expressed by tumor cells but not the microenvironment, and that they are not expressed by normal breast progenitors, in other words their activation occurs de novo. We find these genes are epigenetically repressed by DNA methylation, and that their activation upon DNA demethylation is irreversible, providing a memory of past epigenetic disturbances. Basal-like tumors expressing both genes have a poorer outcome than tumors expressing either gene alone or neither gene. Therefore, these findings suggest a potential synergistic effect between Cancer/Testis genes in basal breast tumors; these findings have consequences for the understanding, diagnosis, and therapy of the breast tumors with the worse outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.