Back

Metacognitive insight into cognitive performance in pre and early-stage Huntington's disease

Hewitt, S. R.; White, A. J.; Mason, S. L.; Barker, R. A.

2021-10-26 neurology
10.1101/2021.10.25.21265369 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesInsight is an important predictor of quality of life in Huntingtons disease and other neurodegenerative conditions. However, estimating insight with traditional methods such as questionnaires is challenging and subject to limitations. This cross-sectional study experimentally quantified metacognitive insight into cognitive performance in Huntingtons disease gene-carriers. MethodsWe dissociated perceptual decision-making performance and metacognitive insight into performance in healthy controls (n=29), premanifest (n=19) and early-manifest (n=10) Huntingtons disease gene-carriers. Insight was operationalised as the degree to which a participants confidence in their performance was informative of their actual performance (metacognitive efficiency) and estimated using a computational model (HMeta-d). ResultsWe found that pre and early-manifest Huntingtons disease gene-carriers were impaired in making perceptual decisions compared to controls. Gene-carriers required more evidence in favour of the correct choice to achieve similar performance and perceptual impairments were increased in those with manifest disease. Surprisingly, despite marked perceptual impairments, Huntingtons disease gene-carriers retained metacognitive insight into their perceptual performance. This was the case after controlling for confounding variables and regardless of disease stage. ConclusionWe report for the first time a dissociation between impaired cognition and intact metacognition (trial-by-trial insight) in the early-stages of a neurodegenerative disease. This unexpected finding contrasts with the prevailing assumption that cognitive deficits are associated with impaired insight. Future studies should investigate how intact metacognitive insight could be used by some early Huntingtons disease gene-carriers to positively impact their quality of life.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.