Neural basis of learning to perceive speech through touch using an acoustic-to-vibrotactile speech sensory substitution
Malone, P. S.; Eberhardt, S. P.; Auer, E. T.; Klein, R.; Bernstein, L. E.; Riesenhuber, M.
Show abstract
The goal of sensory substitution is to convey the information transduced by one sensory system through a novel sensory modality. One example is vibrotactile (VT) speech, for which acoustic speech is transformed into vibrotactile patterns. Despite an almost century-long history of studying vibrotactile speech, there has been no study of the neural bases of VT speech learning. We here trained hearing adult participants to recognize VT speech syllables. Using fMRI, we showed that both somatosensory (left post-central gyrus) and auditory (right temporal lobe) regions acquire selectivity for VT speech stimuli following training. The right planum temporale in particular was selective for both VT and auditory speech. EEG source-estimated activity revealed temporal dynamics consistent with direct, low-latency engagement of right temporal lobe following activation of the left post-central gyrus. Our results suggest that VT speech learning achieves integration with the auditory speech system by "piggybacking" onto corresponding auditory speech representations. Significance statementIn sensory substitution, the information conveyed by one sensory system is used to replace the function of another. Blind individuals, for example, can learn to use a visual-to-acoustic sensory substitution device to navigate the world. We tested the hypothesis that sensory substitution can more generally occur in typical individuals, by exploiting the existence of multi-sensory convergence areas in the brain. We trained hearing participants to recognize speech syllables presented as vibrotactile stimulation patterns. Using fMRI and EEG, we show that vibrotactile speech learning integrates with the auditory speech system by "piggybacking" onto corresponding auditory speech representations. These results suggest that the human brain can bootstrap new senses by leveraging one sensory system to process information normally processed by another.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metamodal Coupling of Vibrotactile and Auditory Speech Processing Systems Through Matched Stimulus Representations 98%
- Differential auditory and visual phase-locking are observed during audio-visual benefit and silent lip-reading for speech perception 97%
- Processing of auditory feedback in perisylvian and insular cortex 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech sound categorization: The contribution of non-auditory and auditory cortical regions 97%
- Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise 97%
- From acoustic to linguistic analysis of temporal speech structure: acousto-linguistic transformation during speech perception using speech quilts. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech 96%
- Irrelevant Predictions: Distractor Rhythmicity Modulates Neural Encoding in Auditory Cortex 96%
- Lateralised cerebral processing of abstract linguistic structure in clear and degraded speech 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical tracking of voice pitch in the presence of multiple speakers depends on selective attention 96%
- Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss 95%
- Short-term audiovisual spatial training enhances electrophysiological correlates of auditory selective spatial attention 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.