Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure: implications for variant effect prediction
Gerasimavicius, L.; Livesey, B. J.; Marsh, J. A.
Show abstract
Most known pathogenic mutations occur in protein-coding regions of DNA and change the way proteins are made. Taking protein structure into account has therefore provided great insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying human genetic disease. While there has been much focus on how mutations can disrupt protein structure and thus cause a loss of function (LOF), alternative mechanisms, specifically dominant-negative (DN) and gain-of-function (GOF) effects, are less understood. Here, we have investigated the protein-level effects of pathogenic missense mutations associated with different molecular mechanisms. We observe striking differences between recessive vs dominant, and LOF vs non-LOF mutations, with dominant, non-LOF disease mutations having much milder effects on protein structure, and DN mutations being highly enriched at protein interfaces. We also find that nearly all computational variant effect predictors underperform on non-LOF mutations, even those based solely on sequence conservation. However, we do find that non-LOF mutations could potentially be identified by their tendency to cluster in three-dimensional space. Overall, our work suggests that many pathogenic mutations that act via DN and GOF mutations are likely being missed by current variant prioritisation strategies, but that there is considerable scope to improve computational predictions through consideration of molecular disease mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding Missense Variants by Incorporating Phase Separation via Machine Learning 96%
- DeMAG predicts the effects of variants in clinically actionable genes by integrating structural and evolutionary epistatic features 95%
- DIP/Dpr interactions and the evolutionary design of specificity in protein families 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered protein regions enable biophysical interpretation of variant effect predictors 94%
- IMPROVE-DD: Integrating Multiple Phenotype Resources Optimises Variant Evaluation in genetically determined Developmental Disorders 92%
- Functional characterization of pathogenic SATB2 missense variants identifies distinct effects on chromatin binding and transcriptional activity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An interpretable molecular framework for predicting cancer driver missense mutations 96%
- Accurate Identification and Mechanistic Evaluation of Pathogenic Missense Variants with Rhapsody-2 95%
- Integrated evolutionary and structural analysis reveals xenobiotics and pathogens as the major drivers of mammalian adaptation 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.