Back

Cloud-enabled Fiji for reproducible, integrated and modular image processing

Hung, L.-H.; Straw, E.; Reddy, S.; Colburn, Z.; Yeung, K. Y.

2021-10-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.10.22.465513 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modern biomedical image analyses workflows contain multiple computational processing tasks giving rise to problems in reproducibility. In addition, image datasets can span both spatial and temporal dimensions, with additional channels for fluorescence and other data, resulting in datasets that are too large to be processed locally on a laptop. For omics analyses, software containers have been shown to enhance reproducibility, facilitate installation and provide access to scalable computational resources on the cloud. However, most image analyses contain steps that are graphical and interactive, features that are not supported by most omics execution engines. We present the containerized and cloud-enabled Biodepot-workflow-builder platform that supports graphics from software containers and has been extended for image analyses. We demonstrate the potential of our modular approach with multi-step workflows that incorporate the popular and open-source Fiji suite for image processing. One of our examples integrates fully interactive Fiji macros with Jupyter notebooks. Our second example illustrates how the complicated cloud setup of an computationally intensive process such as stitching 3D digital pathology datasets using BigStitcher can be automated and simplified. In both examples, users can leverage a form-based graphical interface to execute multi-step workflows with a single click, using the provided sample data and preset input parameters. Alternatively, users can interactively modify the image processing steps in the workflow, apply the workflows to their own data, change the input parameters and macros. By providing interactive graphics support to software containers, our modular platform supports reproducible image analysis workflows, simplified access to cloud resources for analysis of large datasets, and integrated workflows across imaging, genomics and transcriptomics data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.4%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.0%
3
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
7
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
8
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
9
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Journal of Open Source Software
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%