Back

High-resolution spatiotemporal transcriptomic maps of developing Drosophila embryos and larvae

Wang, M.; Hu, Q.; Lv, T.; Wang, Y.; Lan, Q.; Tu, Z.; Xiang, R.; Wei, Y.; Han, K.; An, Y.; Cheng, M.; Xu, J.; Esteban, M.; Lu, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, S.; Chen, C.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Hu, Y.; Liu, L.

2021-10-22 developmental biology
10.1101/2021.10.21.465301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drosophila has long been a successful model organism in multiple fields such as genetics and developmental biology. Drosophila genome is relatively smaller and less redundant, yet largely conserved with mammals, making it a productive model in studies of embryogenesis, cell signaling, disease mechanisms, etc. Spatial gene expression pattern is critical for understanding of complex signaling pathways and cell-cell interactions, whereas temporal gene expression changes need to be tracked during highly dynamic activities such as tissue development and disease progression. Systematic studies in Drosophila as a whole are still impeded by lack of these spatiotemporal transcriptomic information. Drosophila embryos and tissues are of relatively small size, limiting the application of current technologies to comprehensively resolve their spatiotemporal gene expression patterns. Here, utilizing SpaTial Enhanced REsolution Omics-sequencing (Stereo-seq), we dissected the spatiotemporal transcriptomic changes of developing Drosophila with high resolution and sensitivity. Our data recapitulated the spatial transcriptomes of embryonic and larval development in Drosophila. With these data, we identified known and previously undetected subregions in several tissues during development, and revealed known and potential gene regulatory networks of transcription factors within their topographic background. We further demonstrated that Stereo-seq data can be used for 3D reconstruction of Drosophila embryo spatial transcriptomes. Our data provides Drosophila research community with useful resources of spatiotemporally resolved transcriptomic information across developmental stages.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
3
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
11
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
14
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
22
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%