Back

Distinct phases within large RNP granules of C. elegans oocytes are associated with differential stress responses of RNA binding proteins

Watkins, B.; Elaswad, M. T.; Pestrue, C.; Sharp, K.; Breton, E.; Schisa, J. A.

2021-10-17 cell biology
10.1101/2021.10.17.464158 bioRxiv
Show abstract

One emerging paradigm of cellular organization of RNA and RNA binding proteins is the formation of membraneless organelles (MLOs). Examples of MLOs include several types of ribonucleoprotein granules that form via phase separation. A variety of intracellular pH changes and post-translational modifications, as well as extracellular stresses can stimulate the condensation of proteins into granules. For example, the assembly of stress granules induced by oxidative stress, osmotic stress, and heat stress has been well-characterized in a variety of somatic cell types. In the germ line, similar stress-induced condensation of proteins occurs; however, less is known about the role of phase separation during gamete production. Researchers who study phase transitions often make use of fluorescent reporters to study the dynamics of RNA binding proteins during live-cell imaging. In this report, we demonstrate that certain conditions of live-imaging C. elegans can cause an inadvertent stress and trigger phase transitions of RNA binding proteins. We show that imaging stress stimulates decondensation of multiple germ granule proteins, and condensation of several P-body proteins. Proteins within larger RNP granules in meiotically-arrested oocytes do not appear to be as sensitive to imaging stress as proteins in diakinesis oocytes of young hermaphrodites, with the exception of the germ granule protein PGL-1. Our results have important methodological implications for all researchers using live-cell imaging techniques. The data also suggest that the RNA binding proteins within large RNP granules of arrested oocytes may have distinct phases which we characterize in our companion paper.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.7%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
5
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
12
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
18
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%