Back

Long-term manifestations and modifiers of prevalence estimates of the post-COVID-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

De-la-Rosa-Martinez, D.; Delaye-Martinez, M. A.; Bello-Chavolla, O. Y.; Sicilia-Andrade, A.; Juarez-Cruz, I. D.; Fermin-Martinez, C. A.; Marquez-Salinas, A.; C. Guerra, E.; Fernandez-Chirino, L.; Martinez-Gutierrez, M. I.; Sandoval-Colin, D. E.; Vilar-Compte, D.

2021-10-18 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.10.17.21265123 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is a multi-system disease comprising persistent symptomatology after the acute phase of infection. Long-term PACS effects significantly impact patient outcomes, but their incidence remains uncharacterized due to high heterogeneity between studies. Therefore, we aimed to summarize published data on PACS, characterizing the clinical presentation, prevalence, and modifiers of prevalence estimates. MethodIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we research MEDLINE for original studies published from January 1st, 2020, to January 31st, 2021, that reported proportions of PACS manifestations. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included patients aged [≥]18 years with confirmed COVID-19 by RT-PCR or antigen testing and a minimum follow-up of 21 days. The prevalence of individual manifestations across studies was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. For evaluating determinants of heterogeneity, meta-regression analysis was performed. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019125025). ResultsAfter screening 1,235 studies, we included 29 reports for analysis. Twenty-seven meta-analyses were performed, and 61 long-term manifestations were described. The pooled prevalence of PACS was 56% (95%CI 45-66%), with the most common manifestations being diminished health status, fatigue, asthenia, dyspnea, myalgias, hyposmia and dysgeusia. Most of the included studies presented high heterogeneity. After conducting the meta-regression analysis, we identified that age, gender, number of comorbidities, and reported symptoms significantly modify the prevalence estimation of PACS long-term manifestations. ConclusionPACS is inconsistently reported between studies, and population characteristics influence the prevalence estimates due to high heterogeneity. A systematized approach for the study of PACS is needed to characterize its impact adequately. Fundingnone

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
2
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
3
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
12
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
22
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
27
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
IJID Regions
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%