Long-term manifestations and modifiers of prevalence estimates of the post-COVID-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
De-la-Rosa-Martinez, D.; Delaye-Martinez, M. A.; Bello-Chavolla, O. Y.; Sicilia-Andrade, A.; Juarez-Cruz, I. D.; Fermin-Martinez, C. A.; Marquez-Salinas, A.; C. Guerra, E.; Fernandez-Chirino, L.; Martinez-Gutierrez, M. I.; Sandoval-Colin, D. E.; Vilar-Compte, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundPost-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is a multi-system disease comprising persistent symptomatology after the acute phase of infection. Long-term PACS effects significantly impact patient outcomes, but their incidence remains uncharacterized due to high heterogeneity between studies. Therefore, we aimed to summarize published data on PACS, characterizing the clinical presentation, prevalence, and modifiers of prevalence estimates. MethodIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we research MEDLINE for original studies published from January 1st, 2020, to January 31st, 2021, that reported proportions of PACS manifestations. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included patients aged [≥]18 years with confirmed COVID-19 by RT-PCR or antigen testing and a minimum follow-up of 21 days. The prevalence of individual manifestations across studies was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. For evaluating determinants of heterogeneity, meta-regression analysis was performed. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019125025). ResultsAfter screening 1,235 studies, we included 29 reports for analysis. Twenty-seven meta-analyses were performed, and 61 long-term manifestations were described. The pooled prevalence of PACS was 56% (95%CI 45-66%), with the most common manifestations being diminished health status, fatigue, asthenia, dyspnea, myalgias, hyposmia and dysgeusia. Most of the included studies presented high heterogeneity. After conducting the meta-regression analysis, we identified that age, gender, number of comorbidities, and reported symptoms significantly modify the prevalence estimation of PACS long-term manifestations. ConclusionPACS is inconsistently reported between studies, and population characteristics influence the prevalence estimates due to high heterogeneity. A systematized approach for the study of PACS is needed to characterize its impact adequately. Fundingnone
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection on young adult population: international observational federated study based on electronic health records through the 4CE consortium 94%
- Epidemiological Risk Factors Associated with Death and Severe Disease in Patients Suffering From COVID-19: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome 95%
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 93%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cohort study of Post COVID-19 Condition across the Beta, Delta and Omicron waves in South Africa: 6-month follow up of hospitalised and non-hospitalised participants 92%
- Survival analysis of all critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the main hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia, 30 March–12 June 2020: what interventions are proving effective? 92%
- Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for Covid-19 patients in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 93%
- Prognostic factors for COVID-19 pneumonia progression to severe symptom based on the earlier clinical features: a retrospective analysis 92%
- The efficacy of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. ex Nees crude extract in hospitalised mild COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data driven phenotyping and COVID-19 case definitions: a pattern recognition approach 92%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital services for patients with cardiac diseases: a scoping review 91%
- Lowered quality of life in Long COVID is strongly predicted by affective symptoms and chronic fatigue syndrome which are associated with inflammatory processes during the acute infectious phase and consequent neuroimmunotoxic pathways 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.